Back

The Digital Mouse: why computational modelling of mouse models of disease can improve translation

van Riel, N. A.; Mueller, R.; Dall'Ara, E.

2020-05-05 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.05.04.075812 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational models can be used to study the mechanistic phenomena of disease. Current mechanistic computer simulation models mainly focus on (patho)physiology in humans. However, often data and experimental findings from preclinical studies are used as input to develop such models. Biological processes underlying age-related chronic diseases are studied in animal models. The translation of these observations to clinical applications is not trivial. As part of a group of international scientists working in the COST Action network MouseAGE, we argue that in order to boost the translation of pre-clinical research we need to develop accurate in silico counterparts of the in vivo animal models. The Digital Mouse is proposed as framework to support the development of evidence-based medicine, for example to develop geroprotectors, which are drugs that target fundamental mechanisms of ageing. HighlightsO_LIComputational modelling of human (patho)physiology is advancing rapidly, often using and extrapolating experimental findings from preclinical disease models. C_LIO_LIThe lack of in silico models to support in vivo modelling in mice is a missing link in current approaches to study complex, chronic diseases. C_LIO_LIThe development of mechanistic computational models to simulate disease in mice can boost the discovery of novel therapeutic interventions. C_LIO_LIThe Digital Mouse is proposed as a framework to implement this ambition. The development of a Digital Mouse Frailty Index (DM:FI) to study aging and age-related diseases is provided as an example. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
6
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
12
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
19
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
26
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%