Back

Efficacy of transoral laser surgery versus linear accelerator radiotherapy for the treatment of T1 glottic carcinoma: a meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes

Zhu, J.; Shen, J.; Zheng, Z.; Lian, X.; Miao, Z.; Hu, K.; Zhang, F.

2020-04-20 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.04.20.050807 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveA meta-analysis was conducted to compare oncologic outcomes for patients of T1 glottic carcinoma who were treated with transoral laser surgery (TLS) or linear accelerator radiotherapy (linac RT). MethodsAll related studies published up to September 2019 were acquired by searching Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, with the index words: glottic, vocal, laryngeal, radiation, radiotherapy, irradiation, laser, surgery, cordectomy, carcinoma and cancer. Relative studies which compared oncologic outcomes between linac RT and TLS were included. Sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. ResultsA total of twelve eligible studies were included for the analysis, which contained three prospective studies and nine retrospective studies. Patients who underwent TLS had increased overall survival (OR = 1.40, 95% CI=1.02-1.94, P=0.04) and laryngeal preservation (OR = 5.37, 95% CI = 3.05-9.44, P < 0.00001) versus who underwent linac RT. No statistical difference was observed between TLS group and linac RT group in terms of local control (OR=0.88, 95% CI = 0.62-1.24, P = 0.47), disease-specific survival (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.26-1.43, P = 0.26), and disease-free survival (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.70-3.81, P = 0.14). ConclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis indicate that there were clinical benefits for patients with glottic carcinoma after TLS compared with linac RT with respect to overall survival and laryngeal preservation. However, more multi-center randomized controlled trials would be urgently needed to prove these differences.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.