Back

Clinical Characteristics of 20,662 Patients with COVID-19 in mainland China: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Tang, C.; Zhang, K.; Wang, W.; Pei, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, P.; Guan, Z.; Gu, J.

2020-04-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.18.20070565 medRxiv
Show abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic and has been widely reported; however, a comprehensive systemic review and meta-analysis has not been conducted. We systematically investigated the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in mainland China to guide diagnosis and treatment. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and SSRN databases for studies related to COVID-19 published or preprinted in English or Chinese from January 1 to March 15, 2020. Clinical studies on COVID-19 performed in mainland China were included. We collected primary outcomes including signs and symptoms, chest CT imaging, laboratory tests, and treatments. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis was conducted, and random-effects models were applied to pooled estimates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42020171606). Of the 3624 records identified, 147 studies (20,662 patients) were analyzed. The mean age of patients with COVID-19 was 49.40 years, 53.45% were male, and 38.52% had at least one comorbidity. Fever and cough were the most common symptoms, followed by fatigue, expectoration, and shortness of breath. Most patients with COVID-19 had abnormal chest CT findings with ground glass opacity (70.70%) or consolidation (29.91%). Laboratory findings shown lymphopenia, increased lactate dehydrogenase, increased infection-related indicators, and fibrinolytic hyperactivity. Antiviral therapy, antibiotic therapy, and corticosteroids were administered to 89.75%, 79.13%, and 35.64% of patients, respectively. Most clinical characteristics of COVID-19 are non-specific. Patients with suspected should be evaluated by virological assays and clinically treated.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
11
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%