Back

A systematic review to assess seizure risk with chloroquine therapy in persons with epilepsy

Pati, S.

2020-04-14 neurology
10.1101/2020.04.09.20056358 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe goal of this systematic review is to assess the published literature for seizure risk with chloroquine therapy in persons with and without epilepsy. With the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a desperate need for therapy against the SARS CoV-2 virus. Chloroquine is one proposed medication that has received substantial public attention. However, drug labeling in the package insertion states that persons with epilepsy have the risk of chloroquine provoking seizures, and this has increased questions and anxiety in the epilepsy community. MethodsPubMed (1970 to March 27, 2020) and the Embase (1970 to March 27, 2020) were searched with the terms chloroquine and seizure or epilepsy. Selected studies were reviewed, and the adverse drug reaction was classified. ResultsOnly nine out of 27 studies were deemed eligible for systematic analysis. Out of the nine studies, only one was a prospective study (N=109), two were case series (N=6), and the remaining 6 were case reports. The dose of chloroquine ranged between 100-500 mg/day, except in one patient, the seizure was after taking 1000 mg. The strength of causality for the drug causing seizures in healthy and persons with epilepsy was mostly possible or unlikely, and none were certain. The only clinical trial that evaluated seizure risk with chloroquine failed to find any significant relation. ConclusionAlthough the drug insertion label states an increased risk of seizure, the systematic review highlights that such a statement is not supported by any class I studies but by anecdotal case reports. The only randomized clinical study revealed that seizures were not associated with an increased blood level of chloroquine or its metabolite. The present systematic review should provide reassurance to busy clinicians and persons with epilepsy that chloroquine, if prescribed to treat COVID-19, lacks any substantial evidence to suggest that the medication increases the risk of seizure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epilepsy Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
4
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
European Journal of Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
12
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
20
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%