Back

Patterns of discursive interactions between students and teachers in the biology learning process in High school: the use of social media

de Souza, S. F.; Armellini, B. R. C.; Luna, A. L.; Moreno, A. C. R.; Netto, M. C. M. G.; Ferreira, R. d. C. C.; Junior, F. K.

2020-04-11 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2020.04.09.034447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Increasingly, blending teaching has become a reality in a generation where the digital language is present in virtually every activity. In addition to allowing greater independence and encouraging students to learn at their own pace, blending teaching allows the student to easily access reliable information quickly. Therefore, new studies related to active learning methodology are fundamental. In this study we analyzed 69 interactions between high school students and their teachers in a biology learning activity using a social networking site and the methodology proposed by Mortimer and Scott. The results showed that the prior knowledge of students as well as questions posing challenges and problems to be solved, a very important approach in learning Science Methodology, were barely explored by teachers and mediators (17% and 1%, respectively). Our data demonstrated that the use of digital technology alone does not guarantee interactions that contribute to the learning process in the field of natural sciences. Proposals were also discussed so that these interactions become more diversified and interesting for students, arousing interest in research and promoting the knowledge of scientific methodology.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.0%
2
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
24
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%