Back

Pulmonary radiological change of COVID-19 patients with 99mTc-MDP treatment

Yuan, X.; Yi, W.; Liu, B.; Tian, S.; Cao, F.; Wang, R.; Qi, B.; Lu, F.; Fang, M.; Pei, F.; Chen, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Pan, Z.; Zhao, D.; Yu, A.

2020-04-14 public and global health
10.1101/2020.04.07.20054767
Show abstract

BackgroundAs increasing cases of COVID-19 around world, urgent need for effective COVID-19-specific therapeutic drugs is necessary; therefore, we conducted a pilot randomized-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of 99mTc-MDP for COVID-19 therapeutic treatment. MethodsA total of 21 mild patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in this pilot RCT from February 2020 through March 2020, and then were assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, into control (11 patients) and 99mTc-MDP group (10 patients). Patients in the control group received routine treatment and patients assigned to the 99mTc-MDP group received a combination of routine treatment and an administration of 99mTc-MDP injection of 5ml/day. Both of the patients in the control and 99mTc-MDP groups were treated for 7 days with the primary end point of CT-based radiological pulmonary changes during 7-day follow-up. FindingsFrom baseline to the day 7, 8 (80%) of 10 mild patients in the 99mTc-MDP group had a significant radiological improvement in lung and a decline in inflammatory infiltration, whereas only 1 (9.1%) of 11 patients in the control group had a radiological improvement in lung. None of the patients in the 99mTc-MDP group had disease progression from mild to severe, as well as an inflammatory cytokine storm, and 2 mild patients (18.2%) in the control group developed severe. During days 7 through 14, the number of patients with radiological improvement in the 99mTc-MDP group remained consistent, and only 1 additional case (22%) in the control group were reported. ConclusionIn this randomized pilot study, 99mTc-MDP had an effective inhibitory effect on the inflammatory disease progression for the therapy of COVID-19, and it can accelerate the absorption of pulmonary inflammation in a short period of time during the process of treatment.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
7.5%
2
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 2%
7.5%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 58%
7.5%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 29%
6.4%
5
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
5.8%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 3%
4.5%
7
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 35%
2.4%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 13%
2.4%
9
Radiotherapy and Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 1.0%
2.3%
10
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 10%
1.6%
12
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 11%
1.6%
50% of probability mass above
13
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
15
European Radiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
19
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
20
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
22
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 13%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 26%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
COVID
based on 12 papers
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
29
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 14%
0.7%