Back

Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Nomogram to Predict COVID-19 Pneumonia

Wang, Z.; Weng, J.; Li, Z.; Hou, R.; Zhou, L.; Ye, H.; Chen, Y.; Yang, T.; Chen, D.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Shen, X.; Jin, S.

2020-04-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.03.20052068 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 virus is an emerging virus rapidly spread worldwide This study aimed to establish an effective diagnostic nomogram for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia patients. METHODSWe used the LASSO aggression and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the predictive factors associated with COVID-19 pneumonia, and established the diagnostic nomogram for COVID-19 pneumonia using multivariable regression. This diagnostic nomogram was assessed by the internal and external validation data set. Further, we plotted decision curves and clinical impact curve to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this diagnostic nomogram. RESULTSThe predictive factors including the epidemiological history, wedge- shaped or fan-shaped lesion parallel to or near the pleura, bilateral lower lobes, ground glass opacities, crazy paving pattern and white blood cell (WBC) count were contained in the nomogram. In the primary cohort, the C-statistic for predicting the probability of the COVID-19 pneumonia was 0.967, even higher than the C-statistic (0.961) in initial viral nucleic acid nomogram which was established using the univariable regression. The C-statistic was 0.848 in external validation cohort. Good calibration curves were observed for the prediction probability in the internal validation and external validation cohort. The nomogram both performed well in terms of discrimination and calibration. Moreover, decision curve and clinical impact curve were also beneficial for COVID- 19 pneumonia patients. CONCLUSIONOur nomogram can be used to predict COVID-19 pneumonia accurately and favourably.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.