Back

Metabologenomics identified fecal biomarkers for bowel movement regulation by Bifidobacterium longum capsules: an RCT

Nakamura, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Murakami, S.; Higashi, K.; Watarai, N.; Nishimoto, Y.; Umetsu, J.; Ishii, C.; Ito, Y.; Mori, Y.; Yamada, T.; Fukuda, S.

2020-03-26 gastroenterology
10.1101/2020.03.23.20041400 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBifidobacterium longum supplementation can be used to regulate bowel movement; however, individuals vary in the response to B. longum treatment. One putative factor is the gut microbiota; recent studies have reported that the gut microbiota mediates diet or drug effects. Here, we investigated intestinal features related to B. longum effectiveness in increasing bowel movement frequency. ResultsA randomized, double-blind controlled crossover trial was conducted with twenty Japanese subjects selected from 50 participants. The subjects received a two-week dietary intervention consisting of B. longum in acid-resistant seamless capsules or similarly encapsulated starch powder. Bowel movement frequency was recorded daily, and time-series fecal collection was conducted for metabologenomic analyses. There were differences among subjects in B. longum intake-induced bowel movement frequency. The responders were predictable by machine learning based on the metabologenomic features of the fecal samples collected before B. longum intake. Between responders and non-responders, the abundances of nine bacterial genera and of three compounds were significantly different. ConclusionsThus, the gut microbiome and metabolome composition have a strong impact on B. longum supplementation effectiveness in increasing bowel movement frequency, and gut metabologenomics enables B. longum supplementation effect prediction before intake. These findings have implications for the development of personalized probiotic treatments. Trial registrationUMIN-CTR, UMIN000018924. Registered 07 September 2015, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021894

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.9%
2
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
9
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
25
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
29
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%