Back

Conjunctival polymerase chain reaction-tests of 2019 novel coronavirus in patients in Shenyang,China

Xu, l.; Zhang, X.; Song, W.; Sun, B.; Mu, J.; Dong, X.; Wang, B.

2020-02-25 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.02.23.20024935
Show abstract

PurposeThe 2019 novel coronavirus(COVID-19) mainly transmitted by person-to-person through inhalation of respiratory droplets. We report the laboratory results of conjunctival PCR-tests and some clinical features of these patients in shenyang China. DesignThis is a cross-sectional non-randomized study SubjectsThe study include 14 confirmly diagnosed cases, 16 suspected cases and some medical observed patients. MethodsAll patients with diagnosed and suspected COVID-19 were admitted to a designated hospital in Shenyang, China. We collected conjunctival samples of these patients to do the laboratory tests by real time RT-PCR. Medical observed patients were enrolled if they had clinical symptoms. Then we analysed the PCR results and clinical data from eletronic medical records in order to find some relationships. Main Outcome MeasuresClinical condition and PCR results. of conjunctival swabs compared with other specimens ResultsOne of the identified case coverted from suspected case without typical clinical symptoms. Twenty-two medical observed cases were removed because none of them converted to identified cases. One of the suspected converted to identified case recently. The included cases in our study are imported cases with less underlying diseases and the severity of their infection was relatively moderate. All the conjunctival results of PCR-test were negative. Two cases had typical clinical symptoms but were finally confirmed by repeated pharynxswabtests. ConclusionConjunctiva may be a transmission way of COVID-19. And ocular conjunctival swabs in combination with PCR test could be a non-invasive, convenient and feasible diagnostic method for identifying the infection of COVID-19. Emphasis on the false-negative results is vital.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 39%
12.9%
2
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 2%
7.7%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 1.0%
7.7%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 2%
6.5%
6
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
British Journal of Ophthalmology
based on 13 papers
Top 0.8%
5.1%
8
Eye
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
4.6%
9
Translational Vision Science & Technology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.9%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 10%
2.9%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 7%
2.9%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 33%
2.6%
13
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
15
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
16
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 68%
1.8%
17
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Ophthalmology Science
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 19%
1.2%
20
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Allergy
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
23
mSphere
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%