Back

A simple laboratory parameter facilitates early identification of COVID-19 patients

Li, Q.; Ding, X.; Xia, G.; Geng, Z.; Chen, F.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.

2020-02-17 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.02.13.20022830 medRxiv
Show abstract

The total number of COVID-19 patients since the outbreak of this infection in Wuhan, China has reached 40000 and are still growing. To facilitate triage or identification of the large number of COVID-19 patients from other patients with similar symptoms in designated fever clinics, we set to identify a practical marker that could be conveniently utilized by first-line health-care workers in clinics. To do so, we performed a case-control study by analyzing clinical and laboratory findings between PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (n=52) and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (n=53). The patients in two cohorts all had similar symptoms, mainly fever and respiratory symptoms. The rates of patients with leukocyte counts (normal or decreased number) or lymphopenia (two parameters suggested by current National and WHO COVID-19 guidelines) had no differences between these two cohorts, while the rate of eosinopenia (decreased number of eosinophils) in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (79%) was much higher than that in SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (36%). When the symptoms were combined with eosinopenia, this combination led to a diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 64%, respectively, much higher than 48% and 53% when symptoms were combined with leukocyte counts (normal or decreased number) and/ or lymphopenia. Thus, our analysis reveals that eosinopenia may be a potentially more reliable laboratory predictor for SARS-CoV-2 infection than leukocyte counts and lymphopenia recommended by the current guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
3
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
12
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
28
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%