Integrated transcriptomics identifies key genes and pathways driving CKD to ESRD progression: implications for diagnosis and prognosis
Zhang, X.; Xie, Y.; Cao, H.; Ping, F.; Yang, H.; Qu, K.; Shen, X.
Show abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) may progress to stage 5 CKD (end-stage renal disease, ESRD), but stage-associated molecular alterations remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to identify candidate biomarkers associated with CKD and ESRD. Methods: Two discovery datasets comparing CKD or ESRD with healthy controls were analyzed using differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Candidate genes were identified by intersecting differentially expressed genes with key co-expression modules, followed by protein-protein interaction network analysis using Degree, Closeness, and Maximal Clique Centrality algorithms. Candidate genes were evaluated in independent GEO validation datasets and further examined by quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting using clinical blood samples. Results: Ten hub genes were identified, among which EPB42, KLF1, and H3F3A were prioritized for further evaluation. EPB42 showed decreased expression in CKD but increased expression in ESRD, indicating an opposite-direction pattern between the two disease states. KLF1 showed no significant difference between healthy controls and CKD but was increased in ESRD, whereas H3F3A was increased in CKD and further increased in ESRD. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted processes related to oxygen transport, mitochondrial function, muscle-associated processes, and inflammation, suggesting possible involvement of hypoxia-associated oxidative injury and ferroptosis-related processes. Conclusions: Integrated transcriptomic and experimental analyses identified EPB42, KLF1, and H3F3A as candidate stage-associated biomarkers in CKD and ESRD. In particular, the opposite-direction expression pattern of EPB42 may provide additional molecular information for distinguishing CKD from ESRD.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported sleep duration and daytime napping are associated with renal hyperfiltration and microalbuminuria in apparently healthy Chinese population 96%
- Structural modeling for Oxford histological classifications of immunoglobulin A nephropathy 96%
- Clinical evaluation of presepsin considering renal function. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The p21 dependent G2 arrest of the cell cycle in epithelial tubular cells links to the early stage of renal fibrosis 96%
- Glomerular spatial transcriptomics of IgA nephropathy according to the presence of mesangial proliferation 95%
- Temporal and sex-dependent gene expression patterns in a renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and recovery pig model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ramadan and Kidney disease (RaK) risk assessment tool. Potential Risk Calculator for Evaluating the Risk of Ramadan Fasting In Chronic Kidney Disease patients 95%
- Kidney transcriptomics signature of prospective rapid diabetic kidney disease progression 94%
- Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers for Diabetic Kidney Disease (iBEAt): Study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biopsychosocial correlates of somatic symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: results of the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) 95%
- Development and Validation of a Web-based Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury after surgery 94%
- Nephron Number and Kidney Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plasminogenuria is associated with podocyte injury, edema, and kidney dysfunction in incident glomerular disease 93%
- Quinomycin A reduces cyst progression in Polycystic Kidney Disease 92%
- Mitochondrial DNA copy number and trimethylamine levels in the blood: new insights on cardiovascular disease biomarkers 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.