Back

Neurophysiological monitoring of sport related concussion: From diagnosis to return to play

Lee, J.; Kirby, E.; Levi, C. R.; Shidiak, L.; Gardner, A.; D'Arcy, R.

2026-10-14 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.10.12.26365262 medRxiv
Show abstract

The validation of objective neurophysiological monitoring of concussion from diagnosis to return to play has the potential to improve the clinical care of athletes. Extracted from event-related potentials (ERP), brain vital signs offer a non-invasive objective neurophysiological measure of three well established ERP responses that complement existing clinical assessments: 1) the N100 response related to auditory sensation; 2) the P300 response related to basic attention; and 3) the N400 response related to cognitive processing. The N400, in particular, has increasingly been demonstrated to be sensitive to head impact related cognitive impairment. Accordingly, brain vital sign measures were collected in n =165 rugby league players from two Australian professional National Rugby League clubs (NRL), with concussed players (n =26) being subsequently assessed over a total of five separate time points (Baseline, Day 2, Day 5, Day 10, and Day 42). This timeline aligned with acute (Day 2), NRL mandatory minimum return-to-play (RTP) guidelines (Day 10), and an extended post RTP period. Relative to baseline, the results revealed significant N400 cognitive processing latency delays at Day 2 post-concussion (p =0.002). The N400 latency delays persisted past day 5, significantly returning to baseline values at Day 10, consistent with the RTP mandatory minimum requirement. The findings indicated that neurophysiological recovery occurred in this cohort within an approximate 10-day time frame. Future studies monitoring brain vital sign changes across the trajectory of injury to recovery are needed in sports related concussion management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.