Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Fusion Models to Predict Response to Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Eckardt, J.-N.; Srivastava, I.; Gill, K.; Osypuk, A. A.; Pan, Z.; Benouis, M.; Schneider, M. M. K.; Schulze, F.; WInter, S.; Sockel, K.; Bornhaeuser, M.; Shahswar, R.; Heuser, M.; Middeke, J. M.; Pollyea, D.
Show abstract
Venetoclax and azacitidine (ven-aza) is a standard of care therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unfit to receive intensive therapy, and may also be appropriate for certain fit patients. Models predicting response to ven-aza currently focus predominantly on genetics. Here, we present two multimodal fusion models: a custom ResNet-34-based model and a pathology foundation model fine-tuned for bone marrow smear (BMS) images that combine clinical and genetic variables with whole slide images. Training on 193 newly diagnosed AML patients who received ven-aza, we obtained an area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic (AUROC) of 0.79 and 0.82 for the ResNet-based and fine-tuned foundation models in a heldout test set, and 0.76 and 0.73 in an external validation set, predicting best response to this therapy. Sensitivity analysis showed that fusing image data with clinical and genetic variables outperformed training on either modality alone. In univariable and multivariable analyses, image-based classification was an independent predictive marker, second only in effect size to IDH1/2 mutation status, outperforming other genetic alterations. Image-based explainability showed high model attention on myeloblasts, suggesting previously unrecognized cell-specific patterns associated with response. Our findings suggest BMS images complement genetic biomarkers to refine outcome prediction in ven-aza treatment and incentivize AI-supported outcome prediction, including bone marrow morphology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence Accurately Identifies Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Beyond Conventional Signs of Dysplasia 96%
- Mutated clones driving leukemic transformation are already detectable at the single cell level in CD34-positive cells in the chronic phase of primary myelofibrosis 91%
- Annotation-Free Deep Learning for Predicting Gene Mutations from Whole Slide Images of Acute Myeloid Leukemia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Impact of Panel Based Error Corrected Next Generation Sequencing versus Flow Cytometry to Detect Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 96%
- Single-cell transcriptomics predicts relapse in MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants 93%
- A three-dimensional ex vivo model recapitulates in vivo features and unravels increased drug resistance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An in vitro quantitative systems pharmacology approach for deconvolving mechanisms of drug-induced, multilineage cytopenias 91%
- The shape of cancer relapse: Topological data analysis predicts recurrence in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia 90%
- Covering Hierarchical Dirichlet Mixture Models on binary data to enhance genomic stratifications in Onco-Hematology 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinicopathologic Correlates and Natural History of Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 93%
- Predicting Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia through Stochastic Modeling of Clonality 91%
- Inhibitory KIR-Ligand Interactions and Relapse Protection Following HLA Matched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real World Predictors of Response and 24-month survival in high-grade TP53 -mutated Myeloid Neoplasms 92%
- High WEE1 expression is independently linked to poor survival in multiple myeloma 91%
- Transcriptome sequencing of Hodgkin lymphoma Hodgkin and Reed-Stenberg cells reveals escape from NK cell recognition and an unfolded protein response 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.