Back

Food Hygiene and associated factors among street food vendors of selected districts of Bagamati Province, Nepal: A cross-sectional study

Poudel, S.; Dahal, A.; Nangia, A.

2026-10-12 nutrition
10.64898/2026.10.09.26365118 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Street food vending is a major source of food supply in Nepal. Poor food hygiene practices among street food vendors pose a health risk by increasing the risk of foodborne diseases. Studies regarding food hygiene knowledge and practices are needed to improve public awareness. Therefore, this study aimed to assess food hygiene knowledge and practice among street food vendors and their associated factors in selected districts of Bagamati Province. Methods A community-based cross-sectional analytical study was carried out among 186 street food vendors of Districts located in central Nepal. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire and an observation checklist. Knowledge and practice levels were categorized as good and poor. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, odds ratio, and Mann-Whitney U test were applied for data analysis. Results Less than half (39.8%) of the vendors had good food hygiene knowledge, while 91.4% of the respondents reported good food safety and hygiene practices. The education level of street food vendors was significantly associated with food hygiene knowledge (p = 0.001) and food safety and hygiene practices (p = 0.042). Significant association was not seen between overall food hygiene knowledge and overall food safety and hygiene practices levels. Conclusion The study identified a gap between food hygiene knowledge and self-reported food hygiene practices among street food vendors. Education, infrastructure, and regulations among street food vendors play a key role in good food hygiene practices more than knowledge alone. Policymakers should focus on training of food vendors, regular supervision, and monitoring of vending sites to enhance food safety.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.