Back

Disentangling the Crabtree and Warburg effects across syngeneic non-tumor and tumor cells.

Duraj, T.; Miller, E. Y.; Ta, L.; Lee, C.; Lee, D. C.; Ramos, M. B.; Aristizabal-Henao, J. J.; Kiebish, M.; Mukherjee, P.; Pellicer, M. B.; Kornreich, C.; Shaver, O.; Seyfried, T. N.

2026-10-07 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.10.06.756891 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) and substrate-level phosphorylation (SLP) are the primary biochemical mechanisms for ATP generation in mammalian cells. Increased dependency on SLP can arise from either transient (e.g., Crabtree effect) or chronic (e.g., Warburg effect) suppression of OxPhos. We evaluated the steady-state bioenergetics of quiescent and proliferating mouse cells matched in genetic background and cell biology, including primary thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages, malignant VM-M3 glioma with macrophage characteristics, and malignant CT-2A astrocytoma. Data are presented showing: 1) OxPhos insufficiency was the primary bioenergetic hallmark of proliferating malignant cells. 2) Dysregulated proliferation was associated with lower metabolic flexibility under nutrient stress than was growth arrest or regulated proliferation. 3) The Crabtree effect was present in macrophages and involved a glucose- and time-dependent suppression of OxPhos coupled to ATP production through SLP and resistance to mitochondrial inhibitors; lowering glucose concentration or substituting glucose with respiratory fuels increased OxPhos and restored sensitivity to mitochondrial inhibitors. 4) The Warburg effect in tumor cells involved a persistent SLP dependency and resistance to mitochondrial inhibitors under equivalent glucose-replete conditions. 5) OxPhos could sustain the regulated proliferation of non-tumor cells in the absence of a Warburg effect. Collectively, our findings emphasize that comparisons between normal and cancer cell metabolism require long-term experimental endpoints that ensure steady-state ATP sufficiency.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.