Back to work MD - Experiences of internal medicine physicians returning to work after parental leave
Hasan, S.; Tang, G. H.; Van Bakel, T.; Fralick, M.; Sholzberg, M.
Show abstract
Background: Parenthood in medicine is an experience fraught with challenges that begin in the pre-conception phase and persist as physician-parents navigate their dual role. Methods: This study aims to understand the experiences of physician-parents (both childbearing and non-childbearing) returning to work after parental leave. Physicians, including residents, affiliated with the University of Toronto Department of Medicine internal medicine division who had a child within the last ten years were invited to participate in a self-administered electronic survey from June2022 to 30June 2023. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-nine respondents took part in the survey; 79% were staff physicians while the remaining were trainees at the time of the survey. At the time their first child was born, 48% were staff members and 52% were trainees. The median duration of parental leave was 5 months (range 1-12 months). Among those for whom lactation was applicable, 76% reported that they continued their lactation efforts on returning to work, while 24% chose not to. Thirty five percent (35%, n=6/17) of respondents cited that they were not provided with duty hour modifications when required. Many respondents (46%) felt guilty about burdening their co-workers for requesting accommodations for childcare. When requested to rate their experiences of balancing their personal and professional lives on a scale of 1-10 (1 being impossible to maintain and 10 being extremely easy to maintain), most respondents (66%) chose a rating of 5 or less. Conclusion: This study supports previous findings that physician-parents face a myriad of challenges integrating their roles in medicine and parenthood. A change in culture is required to support and normalize parenthood for physicians and foster sustainability and productivity in academic medicine.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 93%
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 92%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 96%
- The experiences, challenges, and enablers for promoting interprofessional education among medical students: A Scoping Review 92%
- Impacts of lack of pocket money on undergraduate students' clinical learning activities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 93%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 90%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in patient attachment to an aging primary care workforce: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada 92%
- Physicians in the management and leadership of health care: A systematic review of the conditions conducive to organizational performance 91%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual Recruitment is Here to Stay: 2020 ID Fellowship Program and Matched Applicant Recruitment Experiences 93%
- High proportion of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals 1-6 months after illness and association with disease severity in an outpatient telemedicine population 88%
- When should healthcare workers with COVID-19 return to work? An analysis of follow-up antigen test results after a positive COVID test 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.