Optimising HPV Vaccination for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Women Living with HIV: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Across 13 African Countries

Background Women living with HIV (WLHIV) have an increased risk of persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer. We evaluated the lifetime health impact and cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination strategies targeting WLHIV across 13 African countries. Methods We developed an age-structured Markov model of HPV infection and cervical cancer in a closed cohort of 100,000 females, stratified by HIV status, and calibrated it separately for each country to age-specific cervical cancer incidence, cervical cancer mortality, and female HIV prevalence. Six HIV-targeted strategies were compared with routine two-dose vaccination at age 14 years. The strategies either provided a booster dose to previously vaccinated WLHIV or combined a booster for previously vaccinated WLHIV with a three-dose primary catch-up course for previously unvaccinated WLHIV. Interventions were delivered at ages 18 or 24 years under standard- and high-coverage assumptions. Outcomes included cervical cancer cases averted, cervical cancer deaths averted among WLHIV, discounted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted, additional physical vaccine doses, and incremental costs from the health-system and vaccination-programme perspectives. Results All six strategies generated additional health gains relative to routine vaccination alone. Mean DALYs averted across countries ranged from 8.21 for booster vaccination at age 24 years to 81.36 for high-coverage combined booster and catch-up vaccination at age 24 years. Booster-only strategies produced the greatest health gains per additional physical vaccine dose, whereas the high-coverage combined strategy at age 24 years produced the largest average absolute health gain. However, the relative performance of vaccination at ages 18 and 24 years varied by strategy and country. From the health-system perspective, 68 of 78 country-strategy comparisons were more effective and less costly than routine vaccination after accounting for avoided cervical cancer treatment costs. From the vaccination-programme perspective, all strategies required additional expenditure. Conclusions HPV vaccination strategies targeting WLHIV generated additional health benefits beyond routine adolescent vaccination and were cost-saving in many country-strategy comparisons when avoided cervical cancer treatment costs were included. Booster-only strategies were the most dose-efficient, whereas combined booster and primary catch-up strategies produced larger absolute health gains. The relative performance of strategies delivered at ages 18 and 24 years was context dependent and should not be interpreted as evidence of a universal advantage of later vaccination. Given the limited direct evidence on the clinical effectiveness and duration of protection following HPV booster vaccination among WLHIV, the booster scenarios should be interpreted as exploratory.