Evidence synthesis on sex differences in mortality after traumatic brain injury: Systematic review integrating meta-analysis and explainable machine learning
Phan, D.; Yao, Y.; Shaikh, U.; Ahmad, N.; Mollayeva, T.
Show abstract
Sex differences in mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been inconsistently reported, even after accounting for age, injury severity, and other injury related factors. Understanding the sources of this heterogeneity is important for prognostic research and the development of data-driven clinical decision-support tools. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex-specific mortality after adult TBI and used explainable machine learning (ML) to investigate potential modifiers of between-study effect estimates. We searched eight databases from inception to August 25, 2025, for studies reporting mortality estimates adjusted for at least age and injury severity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Male-to-female mortality estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Three explainable ML algorithms were used to identify important modifiers of study-level effect estimates. Among 9,418 records identified, 21 studies comprising 899,813 participants and 98,286 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses showed lower mortality among females than males (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.98; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.98). Lower mortality among females was also observed for in-hospital mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97) and overall or unspecified mortality (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.88). Substantial residual heterogeneity remained across analyses. Explainable ML identified mean age, study sex composition, and study quality as important modifiers of reported effect estimates. These findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Female sex was associated with lower mortality after adult TBI, although substantial between-study heterogeneity remained. Explainable ML identified demographic and methodological factors that may contribute to variation in reported associations. These findings highlight the importance of population characteristics and study context when developing, validating, and interpreting explainable digital prognostic tools for TBI. PROSPERO: CRD420251252136.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Behavioral Effects in Disorders of Consciousness Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials 92%
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 91%
- Improved Injury Detection Through Harmonizing Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data after Experimental TBI: A Translational Outcomes Project in NeuroTrauma (TOP-NT) Consortium Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 92%
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 91%
- Mortality and outcomes after decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 94%
- Imputation strategies for missing baseline neurological assessment covariates after traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study 92%
- Upregulation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 in traumatic brain injury patients and their potential as biomarkers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury 91%
- White matter abnormalities characterise the acute stage of sports-related mild Traumatic Brain Injury 91%
- A Minimally Invasive, Scalable and Reproducible Neonatal Rat Model of Severe Focal Brain Injury 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.