Structural integrity moderates the cognitive bearing of dopamine clearance in aging
Esmaeili, A.; Preti, G.; Bittner, N.; Woodman, M.; Caspers, S.; Hashemi, M.; Petkoski, S.; Marinazzo, D.; Jirsa, V.
Show abstract
Age-related cognitive decline in humans is well established, yet how neurobiological variations influence brain dynamics, and subsequently behavioral performance, remains insufficiently explored. Microscale accounts of cognitive aging revolve around attenuations in dopamine (DA) receptors and transporters (DAT). In contrast, macroscale accounts associate individual declines in cognitive performance with functional brain networks' reorganization and white-matter tracts' deterioration. We endeavor to bridge this gap with an amortized dopaminergic aging model (ADAM) which assembles aging brain twins by coupling dopaminergic modulation with structural connectomes to constrain emergent whole-brain dynamics. ADAM thereby augments established DAT decline with personalized estimates, through a reusable and generalizable estimator capable of disentangling neuromodulatory from structural contributions to age-related decline within each individual. To that end, we embed structural connectomes into a low-dimensional space exhibiting high reconstruction fidelity and -pseudonymized- individual identifiability. The spectrum of structural embeddings is subsequently updated with fMRI observations to estimate DA clearance timescales in 3,650 adults aged 36 to 95 years across five independent aging cohorts. Our analysis reveals an age-related elevation of DA clearance timescales. Critically, low performers exhibit elevated clearance in adults with marked structural degradation, and only within sliding age windows centred between 56 and 76 years. This supports a contribution of dopamine to aging, and reveals a structure- and age-conditional association between its clearance and cognitive performance. Our findings suggest that structural connectivity gates the macroscale reach of dopaminergic modulation, thus rendering the gain-control framework of neuromodulation mechanistically explicit across individuals and cohorts. ADAM therefore provides a biologically plausible framework that anchors interindividual variability in cognitive aging to perturbations in the dopaminergic system by learning cohort-scale mappings which can be shared across sites, establishing a transferable testbed for precision neuromodulation and future in-silico pharmacological trials.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision Estimates of Longitudinal Brain Aging Capture Unexpected Individual Differences in One Year 97%
- Spinal cord structural and functional architecture and its shared organization with the brain across the adult lifespan 97%
- Aging-associated decline of phosphatidylcholine synthesis is a malleable trigger of natural mitochondrial aging. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations Between Negative Social Ties and Accelerated Biological Aging, Inflammation, and Multiple Morbidities 95%
- Pervasive convergent evolution and extreme phenotypes define chaperone requirements of protein homeostasis 94%
- Age-related behavioral resilience in smartphone touchscreen interaction dynamics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging 94%
- Brain aging comprises many modes of structural and functional change with distinct genetic and biophysical associations 94%
- Microglia aging in the hippocampus advances through intermediate states that drive activation and cognitive decline 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell Epigenomics Uncovers Heterochromatin Instability and Transcription Factor Dysfunction during Mouse Brain Aging 94%
- Quantitative insights into age-associated DNA-repair inefficiency in single cells 93%
- Integration of aged brain multi-omics reveals cross-system mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.