Back

Assessing frailty in lung transplantation candidates

Planas Pascual, B.; Bello, I.; Fernandez-Pinar, V.; Spiliopoulou, S. T.; Deu-Martin, M.; Ballesteros-Reviriego, G.; Berastegui-Garcia, C.; Ribas-Ball, M.; Gomez-Garrido, A.

2026-09-29 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.09.24.26363958 medRxiv
Show abstract

Frailty assessment is important while awaiting lung transplantation (LTx), as frailty is associated with disability and death before and after LTx. We assessed known risk factors and/or frailty indicators in frail, pre-frail, and non-frail patients according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the Frailty Instrument for primary care of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE-FI), and evaluated the value of SHARE-FI as a proxy to detect frail patients. Frailty was assessed using SPPB and SHARE-FI in 82 patients on a waiting list for LTx. Demographic, anthropomorphic, and clinical variables were collected, and patients underwent respiratory/cardiorespiratory, biochemical, and quadriceps muscle performance assessments. The mean age was 57.3 {+/-} 9.4 years. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (41.5%) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (30.6%) were the most common indications for LTx. Four (4.9%), 13 (15.9%), and 65 (79.3%) patients were classified as frail, pre-frail, and non-frail by SPPB, respectively. These figures were 26 (31.7%), 41 (50%), and 15 (18.3%) with SHARE-FI. SPPB found differences between frail/pre-frail and non-frail patients in physical performance (6-minute walking distance) and muscular assessment, while SHARE-FI found differences in age, 6-minute walking distance, and oxygen saturation, and a trend in muscular strength. For COPD and ILD, frailty discrimination was better with SPPB. Concordance between the two measurements was weak, although all SPPB-frail ILD patients were detected by SHARE-FI. In patients awaiting LTx, SPPB showed better discrimination than SHARE-FI for COPD and ILD. SHARE-FI seems appropriate as a preliminary screening instrument for patients with ILD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.