Clinically Recognised Alcohol Use Disorder and Risk of Dementia Subtypes in 1.3 Million Women: A Prospective Cohort Study
Fatih, N. G.; Hippisley-Cox, D.; Ebmeier, K. P.; Gelernter, J.; Reeves, G. K.; Floud, S.; Christodoulou, M. D.; Topiwala, A.
Show abstract
Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with increased dementia risk, but its long-term relationship with dementia, variation by age and subtype, and how this risk compares with that associated with alcohol consumption remain poorly characterised. We investigated these questions in a large prospective cohort of UK women. Methods: We analysed Million Women Study participants recruited aged 50-64 years and followed for more than 20 years through linked health records. Women with hospital-recorded AUD were matched to up to five controls. Cox models estimated associations between time-varying AUD and incident dementia overall, by subtype and attained age, with exposure lags of up to 15 years and competing-risk analyses. Self-reported alcohol consumption was analysed separately. Findings: Among 1,288,359 women, 20,070 with AUD were matched to 100,339 controls. Dementia occurred in 3,774 women with AUD and 8,239 matched controls. AUD was associated with all-cause dementia (HR=3.73 [95% CI 3.52-3.95]), with strongest associations for mixed (5.03 [3.88-6.51]), unspecified (4.29 [3.92-4.70]), and vascular dementia (3.96 [3.44-4.56]). Associations were substantially stronger before age 70 years (10.68 [9.02-12.63]) than at ages 70-79 years (3.75 [3.47-4.04]) or 80 years or older (2.34 [2.11-2.60]). Risk remained elevated with a 15-year lag (2.16 [1.81-2.58]) and after accounting for competing mortality. Associations with self-reported alcohol consumption were substantially weaker. Interpretation: Clinically recognised AUD identifies women at markedly increased and prolonged dementia risk, particularly at younger ages and for vascular and mixed dementia, not captured by drinking quantity alone. People with AUD should be considered a priority population for earlier dementia prevention and risk reduction. Funding: Wellcome Trust Career Development Award to AT (306069/Z/23/Z); NIH grants P50AA012870 and R01DA054869 (JG). The Million Women Study is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (grant number UKRI1464).
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of common psychiatric disorders, suicidal behaviours and premature mortality following violent victimisation: A matched cohort and sibling-comparison study of 127,628 people who experienced violence in Finland and Sweden 88%
- Identifying Potential Causal Risk Factors for Self-Harm: A Polygenic Risk Scoring and Mendelian Randomisation Approach 87%
- Impact on alcohol selection and purchasing of increasing the proportion of non-alcoholic versus alcoholic drinks: randomised controlled trial 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating Metabolites May Illustrate Relationship of Alcohol Consumption with Cardiovascular Disease 89%
- Frailty in individuals with depression, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorders: longitudinal analyses of all-cause mortality 88%
- Evaluating metabolome-wide causal effects on risk for psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Cognitive Impairment in Mood Disorders: Mediation Analyses in the UK Biobank Cohort 90%
- Estimating Demand for Potential Disease modifying Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease in the UK 89%
- Investigating the causal nature of the relationship of subcortical brain volume with smoking and alcohol use 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations between stroke and psychosis: a population-based study 90%
- Differences in Genetic Correlations between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder-Related Phenotypes Compared to Alcohol Consumption-Related Phenotypes 88%
- Association between complement component 4A expression, cognitive performance and brain imaging measures in UK Biobank 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.