Personalized Pediatrician-Scientist Training Program Optimizes Institutional Research Investment
Plosa, E.; Denison, M. R.; Bonnet, K.; Yarlagadda, A.; Muthakana, N.; Schlundt, D.; Bastarache, J.; DeBaun, M.
Show abstract
Abstract Objective: Physician-scientists are a diminishing subset of the pediatrician work force, uniquely trained to advance child health through scientific discovery. The current financial landscape of academic medical centers makes traditional resource-intensive training programs untenable. Continued renewal of this critical pediatric workforce requires new resource-efficient methodologies. Thus, we evaluated the impact of the NICHD supported Vanderbilt K12 program, a personalized, intensive training program. Study Design: We tracked academic outcomes for scholars with K12 appointments between January 2015 and December 2022. Our primary outcome was receipt of a mentored career development award (K08 or K23). Successful transition from mentored to independent NIH funding (K to R transition) was used as a secondary outcome. Academic outcomes for faculty participating in a large, institutional training program, the Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholars program (VFRS), served as a comparison cohort. A complementary qualitative evaluation of the K12 program was performed. Results: K12 scholars earned career development awards (73%) at an equivalent rate to VFRS faculty (71%) and transitioned K to R funding at equivalent rates, 45% of K12 scholars compared to 50% for VFRS. Qualitative analysis demonstrated K12 scholars valued a personalized training program that incorporated self-efficacy and adaptability, key tenets of Social Cognitive Career Theory. Conclusion: Personalized physician-scientist training programs may enhance efficient utilization of research resources in Pediatric academic departments and serve as a viable alternative to traditional programs. Our qualitative evaluation suggests scholar self-efficacy and adaptability can be achieved through a personalized training program.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 94%
- PREP-aring is worth it: Success of the Case Western Reserve University Post-baccalaureate Research Education Program and its Scholars 93%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 93%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 93%
- Dissemination and Stakeholder Engagement Practices Among Dissemination & Implementation Scientists: Results from an Online Survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 92%
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 92%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.