Confounder-Adjusted Plasma Proteomics Identify Robust Protein Signatures in Sepsis Across Two Independent Perioperative Control Cohorts
Weber, M.; Witowski, A.; Bayer, M.; Krause, F.; Grugel, R.; Willemsen, K. M.; Westhus, B.; Fuchs, K.; Zuelch, B.; Busch, S.; Rahmel, T.; Nowak, H. S.; Koos, B.; Rump, K.; Ziehe, D.; Eisenacher, M.; Adamzik, M.; Sitek, B.; Bracht, T.
Show abstract
Background Sepsis is the primary driver of mortality in intensive care. Personalized medicine requires an accurate understanding of the syndrome, and plasma proteomics is increasingly used to characterize its molecular alterations. Comorbidities, demographics and postoperative sterile inflammation complicate this task, and proteins associated with them may be mistaken as sepsis-specific. Methods We compared 343 sepsis patients with two independent perioperative control cohorts (n = 73 and n = 75) sampled before and after surgery. Plasma was analyzed by mass spectrometry, and analyzed using linear models adjusted for age, sex and cohort-specific comorbidities. Propensity score matching was used to characterize renal comorbidities and Elastic Net classifiers were trained per cohort and time point. Results We show that renal comorbidities had the strongest impact on the plasma proteome and affected sepsis-associated proteins including Cystatin-C and Beta-2-microglobulin. Eleven proteins were robustly associated with sepsis, among them established acute phase proteins and the less well characterized Beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 1. Feature importance analysis confirmed this core set and identified further proteins that contributed in a cohort- and time point-specific manner. Classifiers performed very well except against control patients at day 3 after surgery, when sterile inflammation peaked. Conclusions Sepsis, comorbidities and sterile inflammation may alter the same acute phase and renal proteins, differing in magnitude rather than in the type of response. We disentangled these influences and report a robust set of sepsis-associated proteins together with confounder-associated proteins, providing a basis for future studies and the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteomic profiling of plasma extracellular vesicles identifies signatures of innate immunity, coagulation, and endothelial activation in septic patients 91%
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 91%
- Plasma proteomics reveals markers of metabolic stress in HIV infected children with severe acute malnutrition 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated plasma cholesterol causally improves sepsis outcome by promoting hepatic metabolic reprogramming 91%
- Plasma gradient of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor is linked to pathogenic plasma proteome and immune transcriptome and stratifies outcomes in severe COVID-19 91%
- Use of IFNγ/IL10 ratio for stratification of hydrocortisone therapy in patients with septic shock 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Minimalistic Transcriptomic Signatures Permit Accurate Early Prediction of COVID-19 Mortality 92%
- Integration of urine proteomics and renal single-cell genomics identifies an interferon-gamma response gradient in lupus nephritis. 91%
- Plasma (1-3)-β-d-glucan levels are associated with host inflammatory responses and predict adverse clinical outcomes in critical illness 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-Omics and Machine Learning-Based Profiling of Severity Signatures in Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Infection in Children 89%
- Multimodal Analysis for Human ex vivo Studies Shows Extensive Molecular Changes from Delays in Blood Processing 89%
- Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Mediates Endothelial Glycocalyx Degradation and Correlates with Severity of Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.