Back

Gut microbiota-dependent phenylpropanoic acid derivatives reduced in cancer cachexia protect against myotube atrophy

Degraeve, A. L.; Li, X.; Lefevre, C.; Piron, E.; Loriot, A. L.; Delzenne, N.; Neyrinck, A. M.; Bindels, L.

2026-09-18 microbiology
10.64898/2026.09.17.752337 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cachexia is a debilitating disease characterized by muscle atrophy. Given the gut dysbiosis in cancer cachexia and the increasing evidence of a gut-muscle axis, we explored the potential beneficial effects of bacteria-dependent metabolites on myotube atrophy. Using both hypothesis-driven and hypothesis-free approaches, in-depth metabolomic analysis of blood samples from cachectic C26 tumor-bearing mice treated or not with antibiotics, as well as disease-free germ-free and conventionalized mice, identified 7 bacteria-dependent metabolites decreased under cachectic conditions. Such alterations were not mediated by reduced caloric intake. Among them, 2 metabolites, namely 2-phenylpropanoic acid (2PPA, also known as 2-phenylpropionic acid) and 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid (3,4OHPP, also known as 3,4-dihydroxyhydrocinnamic acid or dihydrocaffeic acid), demonstrated anti-atrophying effect, alone and in combination, on mouse C2C12 myotubes. Transcriptomics revealed that these 2 bacteria-dependent metabolites restored the amino acid homeostasis with an activation of ATF4 and the serine biosynthesis pathway. Pharmacological inhibition of the phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH), the rate-limiting enzyme of this pathway, prevented the anti-atrophying effects of 2PPA and 3,4OHPP, indicating a causal role for PHGDH in this effect. By identifying microbiota-dependent metabolites as potential therapeutic levers, the current work not only advances our understanding of microbiome-host crosstalk in disease but also opens avenues for innovative, targeted interventions to mitigate muscle atrophy.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.