The Impact of Using a Patient Health Passport on Health Outcomes among Adults with Diabetes. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Morais, L.; Wilson, H.; Moore, Z.; Patton, D.; Avsar, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionCurrent evidence suggests that patient health passports may improve care for patients with chronic illnesses. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of patient health passports on health outcomes in adults with diabetes. MethodsA systematic review was conducted in February 2025 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The review included studies of adult diabetic patients using paper or digital patient health passport as part of their care in comparison with the standard of care. Data were analysed using meta-analysis and a thematic analysis where appropriate; otherwise, the data are presented narratively. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias and Evidence-based librarianship checklist. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. ResultsEleven studies (n=14,350) were included. Seven studies were randomised controlled trials, two were retrospective in nature, one was a qualitative and one was a pre-post study. Overall, the studies are limited in design, resulting in high or unclear risk of bias across multiple domains. Results of the meta-analysis of five studies showed a statistically significant mean difference reduction in HbA1c and total cholesterol in favour of the intervention group; however, the certainty of the evidence is low or very low. The narrative analysis of the data revealed little to no improvement in body mass index, blood pressure, blood glucose, and cholesterol levels. Patients opinions and perceptions revealed some benefits in usability, perceived value, and in enhancing collaboration. ConclusionThis review provides evidence suggesting that patient health passports may improve patient care and can inform the design of future high-quality studies. However, the low certainty of the evidence highlights the need for high-quality studies with larger sample sizes. Key PointsO_LIPatient health passports show promise in enhancing diabetes management, however current evidence is limited by high risk of bias; future high-quality studies are required to confirm efficacy. C_LIO_LINurses are pivotal in this process as they play a central role in diabetes education, self-management support and continuity of care. C_LIO_LIPatient health passports could be considered as a structured tool to facilitate ongoing monitoring, reinforce adherence, enhance communication between patient and nurses/multidisciplinary team. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 93%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
- An mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 96%
- Impact of health systems interventions in primary health settings on type 2 diabetes care and health outcomes among adults in West Africa: a systematic review protocol 95%
- Telehealth during and beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Licensed Dietitians in an Emerging Economy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey 95%
- The clinical outcomes and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for diabetes and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Nothing About Us Without Us: A Scoping Review and Priority-Setting Partnership in Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 95%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 91%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- Wearables and smartphones for modifiable risk factors in metabolic health: a scoping review protocol 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.