Lived Experiences Following Sepsis: Burden, Challenges, and Care Needs - A Qualitative Study
Ravichandran, N.; Quinlan, D.; Broughan, J.; Hayes, E.; Ghosh, S.; Fitzpatrick, P.; Clendennen, N.; Cullen, W.
Show abstract
Background Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition caused by the bodys extreme response to an infection. It can have lasting physical, cognitive, psychological and social consequences that extend beyond the acute illness. However, limited research has explored how people with a history of sepsis and their families experience these longer-term consequences and engage with healthcare services in Ireland. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 participants, including 14 people who had personally experienced sepsis and seven family members of people affected by sepsis. Participants were recruited through professional networks and a sepsis charity organisation in Ireland. Interviews were conducted by telephone or Zoom between May and June 2026, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) recovery - a prolonged journey of physical & cognitive rebuilding; (2) navigating a recovery journey: lack co-ordination and integration; (3) continuity of support was uneven and often depended on individual healthcare professionals; (4) recovery reshaped family roles, work and everyday life; and (5) participants suggested a more coordinated approach to recovery. Participants described persistent physical, cognitive and psychological difficulties, alongside substantial effects on family responsibilities, employment and everyday activities. While some participants experienced valuable support from individual healthcare professionals, many described fragmented services, limited information about recovery and uncertainty about where to seek ongoing support. Conclusion Individuals with a history of sepsis and their families described substantial and ongoing consequences and variable experiences of longer-term care. The findings highlight the need to better recognise and respond to longer-term health needs following sepsis and to develop coordinated, accessible approaches to ongoing support in Ireland.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 93%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 93%
- Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of patient advisory councils on recovery for sepsis survivors: a case study 93%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 93%
- Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental perceptions of COVID-19-like illness in their children 91%
- Factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures in the UK; a cross-sectional survey 90%
- Learning about COVID-19 across borders: Public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 91%
- What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital. 89%
- Intensive Care Unit Resource Planning During COVID-19 Emergency at the Regional Level: the Italian case. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 90%
- Mapping domains of early-life determinants of future multimorbidity across three UK longitudinal cohort studies 90%
- Understanding multimorbidity trajectories in Scotland: an application of sequence analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.