Feasibility of remote self-administered cognitive assessment in an Alzheimer's disease treatment clinic
Kaser, A. N.; Stricker, J. L.; Hughes, M. A.; Corriveau-Lecavalier, N.; Boots, E. A.; Machulda, M. M.; Fields, J. A.; Jones, D. T.; McCarter, S. J.; Botha, H.; Coburn, R. P.; Bermudez, C.; Neth, B. J.; Graff-Radford, J.; Ramanan, V. K.; Stricker, N. H.
Show abstract
Introduction: Remote cognitive assessments offer an accessible, scalable way to support clinical characterization and longitudinal monitoring of cognition. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing Mayo Test Drive (MTD), a remote, self-administered digital cognitive assessment, within a specialized clinic focused on eligibility assessments for anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Method: Two-hundred and nine (N=209) patients (Mage=71.2, 53% female) were evaluated through the Mayo Clinic Rochester Alzheimer's Disease Treatment Clinic (ADTC) and had the opportunity to complete MTD, either as a remote, patient-initiated session through a patient-facing healthcare portal or during an in-clinic neuropsychological evaluation. Results: Clinical diagnoses included 55.2% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 31.0% mild dementia, and 11.6% moderate dementia, in addition to 2.2% cognitively unimpaired (CU), as determined by neurology consensus at a multidisciplinary case conference. Among those who initiated MTD (n=197/209), 97.5% completed a session (70.6% remotely, 26.9% in clinic). Completion rates were high across diagnostic groups and did not significantly differ by clinical severity (p=.12): CU (100%), MCI (99.1%), mild dementia (97.0%), and moderate dementia (89.5%). Remote completion rates overall were high (97.9%). Among completers, administration setting (remote vs. in-clinic) did not significantly differ by clinical stage, {chi}2(3)=2.37, p=.49. Reasons for non-initiation included not receiving or opening portal messages and other/unknown factors. Discussion: Remote digital cognitive assessment is feasible within the context of clinic eligibility evaluations for AD therapies. The high completion rates of MTD across clinical impairment levels in this setting support development of paths for broader use in cognitive characterization in AD care.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: an international consensus 95%
- Use of Lecanemab and Donanemab in the Canadian Healthcare System: Evidence, Challenges, and Areas for Future Research 93%
- Continuous Associations Between Remote Self-Administered Cognitive Measures and Imaging Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study 93%
- Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite 93%
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study of People with Alzheimer’s Disease in a Memory Clinic Considering Lecanemab Treatment 94%
- Affective Neuropsychiatric Symptom Metrics in the National Alzheimers Coordinating Center Dataset 94%
- Towards the development of a management protocol for Subjective Cognitive Decline: insights from a cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of multimodal clinical data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a remote dementia educational training among healthcare professionals 95%
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 94%
- Examining a Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite for Telehealth Administration, the tPACC, for Reliability between In-Person and Remote Cognitive Testing with Neuroimaging Biomarkers 93%