Association of object mnemonic discrimination deficit with age and AD biomarkers in older adults
Yang, Z.; Zhuang, X.; Bekris, L. M.; Khrestian, M.; Koenig, K. A.; Curran, T.; Nandy, R.; Giriprakash, P. P.; Han, C.; Pillai, J.; Fox, R.; Lowe, M. J.; Cordes, D.
Show abstract
Background Blood-based Alzheimers disease (AD) biomarkers provide scalable detection of AD pathology, yet their relationships with hippocampal-dependent mnemonic discrimination remain unclear. This study examined how object mnemonic discrimination relates to age, hippocampal structure, and plasma AD biomarkers in cognitively normal (CN) older adults and individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Methods Forty-six CN and forty-one aMCI participants completed an object mnemonic similarity task (MST). Mnemonic discrimination was quantified using the overall lure discrimination index (LDI) and similarity-specific LDIs. Plasma pTau181, pTau217, pTau231, and GFAP were assayed, and hippocampal volumes were derived from 7T MR scanner. Multiple linear regression models assessed associations between LDI and biomarkers, controlling for age, sex, education, APOE4 status, and diagnosis. Repeated-measures ANCOVA and linear mixed-effects models evaluated similarity-dependent age effects. ROC analyses and stepwise logistic regression quantified diagnostic classification performance. Results LDI was significantly reduced in aMCI compared to CN. Total hippocampal volume and plasma pTau217 showed the strongest associations with LDI, exceeding those of pTau181, pTau231, and GFAP. LDI discriminated aMCI from CN with high accuracy (AUC = 0.836), comparable to hippocampal volume and plasma biomarkers. A combined model including LDI, pTau181, pTau217, and hippocampal volume achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.931). Age effects were similarity-dependent: discrimination declined with age only for low-similarity lures, independent of diagnosis. Sex differences emerged within aMCI, with females showing lower LDI than males. Conclusions Object mnemonic discrimination provides a sensitive behavioral marker linked to hippocampal volume and plasma pTau217, showing discriminative power comparable to established AD biomarkers in separating aMCI from CN participants. Similarity-dependent age effects highlight age-related deficits are not universal for lures with varying similarity levels.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuro-Metabolic and Vascular Dysfunction as an Early Diagnostic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. 96%
- Multiscale Metabolic Covariance Networks Uncover Stage-Specific Biomarker Signatures Across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum. 95%
- Selective reduction of KCNA4 in vulnerable glutamatergic-serotonin neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus in Alzheimers Disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 96%
- Anterolateral entorhinal cortex thickness as a new biomarker for early detection of Alzheimer's disease 96%
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pupillary dilation responses as a midlife indicator of risk for Alzheimer’s Disease: Association with Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk 97%
- Cortisol associated with hypometabolism across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum 96%
- Myo-inositol and total NAA in the hippocampus are linked to CSF tau pathology in cognitively normal older adults 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Amyloid and tau pathologies are drivers of white matter damage in aging and Alzheimers disease 97%
- Topographical differences in white matter hyperintensity burden and cognition in aging, MCI, and AD 96%
- Progression of fiber bundle damage in amnestic Alzheimer's disease and LATE: a 2-year fixel-based study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.