Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review, Narrative Synthesis and Exploratory Meta-Analysis
Tupper, M.; Myers, M.; Baig, S.; Aziz, M.; Balami, J.; Su, L.; Majid, A.; Ali, A. N.
Show abstract
Background: Haemorrhagic stroke, comprising intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), accounts for a disproportionate share of stroke mortality and disability, and its incidence rises steeply with age. Secondary injury processes, including neuroinflammation, cerebral oedema, autonomic dysfunction and vasospasm, are potentially modifiable. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) engages several of these pathways, but its therapeutic role remains uncertain. We reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence for VNS in haemorrhagic stroke. Methods: PubMed and MEDLINE were searched from inception to 1 June 2026 for preclinical studies and randomised clinical trials of VNS in ICH or SAH. Evidence was synthesised narratively; quality was assessed using SYRCLE and PEDro. Comparable binary functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0 to 2) were pooled using a random-effects inverse-variance model. Results: Nine reports were included: four preclinical (179 animals) and five clinical (166 participants representing four independent cohorts). Preclinical studies reported reduced inflammatory signalling, smaller haematoma volume, lower aneurysm rupture rates, improved survival and enhanced motor recovery, with attenuated effects in severe injury models. Clinically, non-invasive VNS was feasible and well tolerated, with signals of reduced tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6, less radiographic vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischaemia, and increased parasympathetic activity. Pooled favourable functional outcome favoured VNS but was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 4.86; p = 0.24; I squared = 0%). Excluding major haemorrhage yielded OR 2.85 (95% CI 0.97 to 8.36; p = 0.06). Conclusions: VNS is biologically active and feasible after haemorrhagic stroke but remains unproven. Adequately powered, severity-stratified multicentre trials with standardised stimulation protocols and age-appropriate outcomes are required.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 92%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking does not alter treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in mild to moderate acute ischemic stroke; a Dutch String-of-Pearls Institute (PSI) Stroke Study 93%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 92%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Tranexamic acid for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis 95%
- NOTCH3 variants are common in the general population and associated with stroke and vascular dementia: an analysis of 200,000 participants 91%
- The effect of GLP-1RA exenatide on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Randomised Clinical Trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 94%
- Genetic downregulation of interleukin-6 signaling and arteriolosclerotic cerebral small vessel disease: a drug target Mendelian randomization analysis 93%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 93%
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Future Promises, Perils, and Practicalities 91%
- Cerebral Microvascular Injury in Severe COVID-19 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.