Diagnostic Value of Large Language Model-Extracted Gross Brain Findings in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Ono, D.; Dickson, D. W.; Koga, S.
Show abstract
Gross brain findings help guide differential diagnosis, but their diagnostic value across major neurodegenerative diseases remains incompletely characterized. We evaluated whether gross descriptions in autopsy reports could classify cases by final neuropathologic diagnosis. We analyzed 5,613 autopsy cases from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank collected between 1998 and 2023, including seven diagnostic categories: Alzheimer disease (AD), Lewy body disease (LBD), combined AD and LBD (AD-LBD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration, corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). A fine-tuned large language model (LLM) converted narrative gross descriptions into semi-quantitative scores for 39 features. Extraction accuracy was 0.95 in 200 manually annotated feature-level test examples. A CatBoost classifier used the extracted scores as input, whereas a second fine-tuned LLM used standardized textual descriptions of the same features. Both classifiers also included age at death, sex, and brain weight. Performance was evaluated in the same held-out test set of 562 cases. CatBoost achieved an accuracy of 0.73, a Cohen's kappa of 0.65, and a macro-average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92. The text-based LLM achieved an accuracy of 0.75 and a kappa of 0.68. Macro-average sensitivity was 0.66 for both models. PSP sensitivity was 0.92 with CatBoost and 0.93 with text-based LLM. Corresponding sensitivities were 0.87 and 0.92 for MSA, but only 0.21 and 0.03 for AD-LBD. Feature attribution analysis identified subthalamic nucleus atrophy and putaminal abnormalities as contributors to PSP and MSA predictions, respectively. Narrative gross descriptions contained diagnostic information, particularly for disorders with distinctive macroscopic patterns, whereas combined AD-LBD remained difficult to distinguish.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable deep learning of myelin histopathology in age-related cognitive impairment 92%
- PERFORMANCE OF αSYNUCLEIN RT-QUIC IN RELATION TO NEUROPATHOLOGICAL STAGING OF LEWY BODY DISEASE 92%
- Comparative profiling of the synaptic proteome from Alzheimer’s disease patients with focus on the APOE genotype 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A 3’ UTR Deletion Is a Leading Candidate Causal Variant at the TMEM106B Locus Reducing Risk for FTLD-TDP 92%
- Cumulative genetic risk and C9orf72 repeat status independently associate with ALS status in two case-control studies 89%
- Association of genetic variation at the GJA5/ACP6 locus with motor progression in Parkinson’s 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- c-Triadem: A constrained, explainable deep learning model to identify novel biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease 93%
- Identifying incident dementia by applying machine learning to a very large administrative claims dataset 93%
- Gene-Based Analysis in HRC Imputed Genome Wide Association Data Identifies Three Novel Genes For Alzheimer’s Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ADNC-RS, a clinical-genetic risk score, predicts Alzheimer's pathology in autopsy-confirmed Parkinson's Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies 93%
- Alzheimer's disease clinical variants show distinct regional patterns of neurofibrillary tangle accumulation 93%
- Essential tremor with tau pathology features seeds indistinguishable in conformation from Alzheimer's disease and primary age-related tauopathy 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.