Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Swiss Ball Balance Training and Conventional Balance Training to Improve Trunk Control and Mobility in Individuals with Sub acute Stroke.
Nkhoma, B.; Mapulanga, M.
Show abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with low- and middle-income countries carrying the greatest burden. Impaired trunk control and balance are common after stroke, severely limiting mobility and independence and increasing the risk of falls. Conventional balance training is widely used to improve stability, but it primarily targets static postural control and may not sufficiently activate trunk muscles during dynamic tasks. Swiss ball balance training, which uses an unstable surface to engage core musculature and enhance sensorimotor integration, has shown promising results in improving trunk control and functional mobility. However, research comparing Swiss ball balance training with conventional balance training is limited, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to compare the effects of Swiss ball training and conventional balance training on trunk control, balance, and mobility in individuals with subacute stroke. A randomized, assessor-blinded, two-period, two-sequence crossover trial will be conducted. Participants will be randomly assigned to Swiss Ball Balance Training or Conventional Balance Training, each administered for 45 minutes per session, three days per week, over six weeks, with a one-week washout period between phases. Standardized clinical outcome measures will assess trunk control, postural stability, and functional mobility at baseline and after each intervention phase. Data will be analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests in Stata v17 (p < 0.05). It is expected that Swiss ball exercises will yield greater improvements in trunk control, balance performance, and functional mobility than conventional methods. The results are expected to help design context-specific rehabilitation programs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the optimal reactive balance training intensity in people with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomized control trial 97%
- Postural control telerehabilitation with a low-cost virtual reality protocol for children with cerebral palsy: Protocol for a clinical trial 96%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 96%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 95%
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 95%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 95%
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke 95%
- Walking Gaze Behavior After a Stroke: More Than Meets the Eye 94%
- “It all ends too soon” - Exploring stroke survivors and physiotherapists perspectives on stroke rehabilitation and the role of technology for promoting access to rehabilitation in the community 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 96%
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 95%
- Fall Injury Avoidance Strategy Scale (FIAS): Development and Validation of a Scale to Quantify Fall-Related Protective Movements 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.