Back

A Dual-Species Plant-derived Extracellular Vesicle and Growth Factors Formulation for Hair and Scalp Care: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

Chang, T.-M.; Wu, C.-C.; Huang, H.-C.; Lu, J.-Y.; Chen, Y.-S.; Kao, P.-L.; Tang, W.-H.; Hsieh, W.-J.; Liu, L. T.-C.; Percec, I.; Chen, C.; Kuo, T.-Y.

2026-09-10 dermatology
10.64898/2026.09.07.26362401 medRxiv
Show abstract

Scalp dysregulation and hair shedding are common cosmetic concerns, driving an increasing demand for non-pharmaceutical interventions, including plant-derived extracellular vesicles (EV) and growth factors. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of topical formulations in 60 healthy adults over a 56-day period, monitoring scalp and hair parameters at Days 14, 28, 42, and 56 relative to baseline (Day 0). Group A: placebo; Group B: base (placebo containing 0.1% caffeine and panthenol); Group C: base + recombinant Fc-fusion long-acting insulin-like growth factor-1 (rIGF-1) and fibroblast growth factor-7 (rFGF-7); Group D: base + Centella asiatica (C. asiatica) + ginger EVs; and Group E: base + rIGF-1, rFGF-7, and C. asiatica + ginger EVs. Group E demonstrated rapid onset and significant superiority over the control and other treatment groups across all parameters. In scalp regulation, Group E achieved a highly significant, time-dependent reduction in excess sebum, reaching a 67% decrease by Day 56. Hair growth kinetics were significantly accelerated in Group E, with a mean cumulative length increase approaching 3.9 cm by Day 56, driven by a surge in mean weekly growth velocity to 1.4 cm/week. Group E also demonstrated the highest improvements in hair thickness (19 m) and hair density (17% increase) by Day 56. Finally, hair shedding was reduced by almost half by Day 56 in Group E. These results demonstrate that the formulation delivers a clinically superior non-pharmaceutical intervention for advanced hair and scalp revitalization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.