Back

Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Age Predictions via Conformal Prediction

Samanta, U.; Shafiei, G.; Karim, H. T.; Satterthwaite, T. D.; Chen, A.

2026-09-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.04.749442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Youth can exhibit signs of delayed or accelerated neurodevelopment, measurable via brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain age prediction seeks to estimate brain age at an individual level using machine learning models fitted on healthy individuals. The brain age gap (BAG): the difference between brain age and chronological age, has been studied as a potential biomarker. However, BAG suffers from known limitations, including dependence on chronological age, regression to the mean, and challenges in interpretability. As an alternative framework, we introduce brain age intervals (BAIs) as a normative interval on an individual's chronological age, based on MRI measures. BAIs can be derived using a recent statistical framework called conformal prediction that yields prediction intervals with guaranteed coverage. We train several brain age prediction models on structural and functional MRI scans from the Reproducible Brain Charts dataset (aged 6-22) and estimated BAIs. The BAIs demonstrated stable empirical coverage close to the nominal 90% level (median coverage=91%, width=7.36 years, root mean square error (RMSE)=2.20 years across 100 repeated train-test splits). Associations between interval coverage and clinical measures (p-factor, parental education) were weak, with only a modest directional signal for parental education. Together, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of uncertainty-aware brain age modeling in youth populations while highlighting the need for larger and more diverse samples to detect meaningful clinical and environmental associations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.