Abdominal Adiposity and Lacunar Stroke: A Mendelian Randomization Mediation Study
Guo, M.; Cong, L.; Liu, Z.
Show abstract
Background: Lacunar stroke accounts for approximately 25% of ischaemic strokes and is linked to metabolic and vascular risk factors. Abdominal adiposity, measured as waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI), is a heritable predictor of cerebrovascular disease independent of overall adiposity, but its biological mediators remain unclear. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) mediation analysis of 16 candidate biomarkers. Methods: Summary-level GWAS data were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS and EBI GWAS Catalog for WHRadjBMI (exposure), 16 mediators, and lacunar stroke (outcome). Instruments met genome-wide significance (P < 5 x 10), LD clumping (r2 < 0.001, 10,000 kb; 1000 Genomes European panel), and F-statistic 10. Inverse variance weighted regression was the primary analysis, with MR-Egger, weighted median, and MR-PRESSO sensitivity analyses. Mediation was quantified using the product-of-coefficients method with delta-method standard errors. Results: Systolic blood pressure showed the largest mediation proportion (29.6%; 95% CI, 12.7%-46.5%), followed by diastolic blood pressure (29.2%; 12.1%-46.3%) and glycated hemoglobin (23.0%; 11.2% to 57.2%). Other mediators included triglycerides (10.8%), fasting insulin (9.9%), blood glucose (7.0%), HDL cholesterol (3.2%), and LDL cholesterol (1.1%). Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent, though MR-Egger intercepts suggested directional pleiotropy for glycoprotein acetyls and CRP (Path A only). Because mediators are intercorrelated, proportions cannot be summed; multivariable MR is needed for joint effects. The HbA1c estimate was imprecise and requires cautious interpretation. Conclusions: Blood pressure, and possibly glycemic control, are the leading mediators linking abdominal adiposity to lacunar stroke. These findings support prioritizing blood pressure management-and potentially glycemic control-to reduce small vessel cerebrovascular disease in individuals with elevated WHRadjBMI.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic downregulation of interleukin-6 signaling and arteriolosclerotic cerebral small vessel disease: a drug target Mendelian randomization analysis 95%
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 94%
- Diet-derived antioxidants do not decrease the risk of ischemic stroke: a Mendelian Randomization Study in over 1 million participants 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- Implications of cranial arterial stenosis and dolichoectasia for cerebral small vessel disease etiopathogenesis: findings from a prospective mild stroke cohort 93%
- Polygenic Risk Score Modifies Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Conferred by Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulin resistance potentiates the effect of remnant cholesterol on cardiovascular mortality in individuals without diabetes 93%
- The association between lymphocyte mitochondrial DNA abundance and Stroke: a combination of multivariable-adjusted survival and mendelian randomization analyses 92%
- Apolipoprotein E genotype, lifestyle and coronary artery disease: gene-environment interaction analyses in the UK Biobank population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic associations of adult height with risk of cardioembolic and other subtypes of ischaemic stroke: a Mendelian randomisation study in multiple ancestries 94%
- Accelerated aortic stiffness is associated with brain structure, perfusion and cognition in the Whitehall II Imaging Sub-study 92%
- Genetically-proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.