Back

Determining the optimal volume of reactive balance training after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Mansfield, A.; Jagroop, D.; Danells, C. J.; Bhatt, T.; Inness, E. L.

2026-09-07 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.09.02.26362056 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Our long-term goal is to determine the optimal volume of reactive balance training (RBT) in people with sub-acute stroke. This study aims to inform the design of a larger trial to address this long-term goal. Trial design: Assessor-blinded three-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. Methods: Participants (n=36) with sub-acute stroke were randomly allocated to one of three groups: 1, 3, or 6 RBT sessions. All sessions were delivered over 2-3 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity and adherence, and completeness of outcome assessments. Participants reported falls and physical activity for 6 months post-training; falls data were used to estimate sample size for a future trial. Functional balance, balance confidence, and balance reactions were assessed at: 1) study enrolment; 2) post-training; and 3) 6 months post-training to estimate effect sizes for a future trial. Results: Thirty-five participants initiated training and 34 contributed post-training assessment data. Intervention adherence was high: participants completed 1.0, 2.9, and 5.7 RBT sessions on average in the 1-, 3- and 6-session, respectively. Functional and questionnaire outcomes were [≥]80% complete at most time points, although follow-up questionnaires at 2 and 4 months met only 74% completeness. Falls monitoring data were available for 30 participants, with 15 falls reported. Estimated sample sizes for a definitive trial using falls as the primary outcome (n=408-782) were not feasible for a single site; alternative primary outcomes (stability following balance perturbations) produced more feasible sample size estimates (n=30-72). Minor adverse events were reported by 1, 2, and 6 participants in the 1-, 3- and 6-session groups, respectively. Conclusions: The modified intervention and assessment procedures were feasible; however, a definitive single-site trial using falls as the primary outcome is not feasible. Stability-based outcomes may support a more feasible future trial. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04219696

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.