Machine learning-derived Alzheimer's disease dimensions: neuroanatomical, cognitive, clinical, functional, and genetic risk heterogeneity signatures
Le, H. N.; Ishrat, S.; Yaghooti, B.; Murad, T.; Sapkota, R.; Thakuri, D. S.; Wong, D. F.; Cruchaga, C.; Initiative, A. D. N.; Chand, G. B.
Show abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by substantial clinical and biological heterogeneity, with diverse neuroanatomical, cognitive, clinical, functional, and genetic risk profiles that are poorly captured by current diagnostic frameworks. Identifying reproducible disease dimensions is critical for understanding divergent pathophysiological mechanisms and designing future stratified therapeutic interventions. Herein, we applied a semi-supervised machine learning clustering framework and robust reproducibility validation strategies to structural MRI data from 1,757 participants, comprising 1,108 cognitively normal controls (CN) and 649 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to AD. We identified two MRI-based neuroanatomical dimensions of AD: Dimension 1 (n = 393; prevalence ~ 61%) and Dimension 2 (n = 256; prevalence ~ 39%). Dimension 1 exhibited widespread cortical and subcortical atrophy, including involvement of the hippocampus, amygdala, parahippocampal, temporal, frontal, and occipital regions, while Dimension 2 showed relatively preserved brain patterns. The two dimensions were not statistically different in demographic characteristics, including age, sex, race, and education (all p > 0.05). Compared to Dimension 2, Dimension 1 had more severe cognitive and clinical impairment, greater functional impairment, elevated APOE {varepsilon}4 carrier burden, and higher polygenic risk for AD (p < 0.05). Analysis of individual-level summary neuroanatomical signature expression scores, quantifying each subject's continuous position along two disease dimensions, revealed that Dimension 1 signature expression correlated strongly with cognitive impairment, clinical severity, functional impairment, and genetic risk, while Dimensional 2 signature expression showed relatively weaker associations. These results reveal that AD encompasses at least two biologically distinct dimensions identifiable from structural MRI profiles and their distinct associations with cognitive, clinical, functional, and genetic profiles. These findings may aid in AD patient stratification for designing targeted therapeutic approaches in the future.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dementia is strongly associated with medial temporal atrophy even after accounting for neuropathologies 96%
- Loss and Reorganisation of Superficial White Matter in Alzheimer’s disease: A Diffusion MRI study 95%
- Unbiased data-driven analysis of five amyloid-beta peptides for biomarker investigations in familial Alzheimer's disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary Validation of a Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metric for Tracking Dementia-Related Neurodegeneration and Future Decline 96%
- MRI and cognitive scores complement each other to accurately predict Alzheimer’s dementia 2 to 7 years before clinical onset 95%
- Hippocampal volume across age: Nomograms derived from over 19,700 people in UK Biobank 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Peripheral inflammation is associated with structural brain atrophy and cognitive decline linked to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease 95%
- Lactate treatment improves brain biochemistry and cognitive function in transgenic Alzheimer's and wild-type mice 94%
- APOE4 is Associated with Differential Regional Vulnerability to Bioenergetic Deficits in Aged APOE Mice 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.