Back

Stability-related foot placement control relies more on mediolateral center-of-mass velocity feedback in people with early Multiple Sclerosis

van Leeuwen, A. M.; Romijnders, R.; Welzel, J.; D'Ascanio, I.; Sturner, K. H.; Hansen, C.; Maetzler, W.

2026-08-31 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.26.26361464 medRxiv
Show abstract

Impaired gait performance and stability is a key symptom often defining disease outcome in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Step-by-step foot placement control in response to variations in the center-of-mass kinematic state is a crucial gait stability mechanism, especially in the mediolateral direction. Even though it is known that people with Multiple Sclerosis are at an increased risk of falling, step-by-step foot placement control remains to be characterized in this population. Here, we explored characteristic foot placement control in ten people with early stage Multiple Sclerosis, compared to 21 controls walking at a similar average gait speed, during 1-minute steady-state treadmill walking. Kinematic data were analyzed using a linear feedback model that correlated foot placement with the center-of-mass kinematic state during the preceding swing phase. People with Multiple Sclerosis demonstrated step-by-step foot placement control in both the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions. No differences were found in foot placement precision between groups. However, foot placement responses to variations in center-of-mass velocity proved stronger in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Moreover, the contribution of mediolateral center-of-mass velocity feedback to the control mechanism was higher in people with Multiple Sclerosis as compared to neurologically healthy controls. Our results suggest that foot placement control is still retained in early clinically evident stages of Multiple Sclerosis, but is realized through differently weighted sensory feedback control.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.