Antiseizure Medication Administration Gaps Across the ICU-to-Floor Transfer: A Matched Within-Patient Comparison
Gorenshtein, A.; Adiniaev, Y.; Srour, A.; Klang, E.; Daniel, O.
Show abstract
Objective: Whether a scheduled antiseizure medication (ASM) continues on schedule across the ICU-to-floor transfer has not been characterized. We quantified ASM administration-gap frequency across this transfer and compared it with gap frequency during matched non-transfer intervals in the same patient and drug. Methods: In this retrospective MIMIC-IV (version 3.1) cohort study, we identified epilepsy and status-epilepticus admissions with an ICU stay followed by floor transfer and a scheduled ASM order active at ICU departure. A gap was defined as an interval exceeding 1.5 times the expected dosing interval between the last ICU dose and first floor dose, or no further dose before discharge, and compared with a matched non-transfer control interval in the same patient and drug (paired McNemar test). A multivariable model evaluated six prespecified clinical predictors; sociodemographic variables were summarized descriptively. Results: Among 2,469 ASM transition-by-drug observations (1,583 admissions, 1,335 patients), an administration gap occurred in 251 (10.2%; 95% CI, 8.7%-11.7%). Gap frequency across the transfer exceeded frequency during matched non-transfer control intervals in the same patient and drug: a paired rate difference of 5.8 percentage points (95% CI, 4.4-7.1; 7.5% vs 1.7%; P = 7.3 x 10^-22) before the transfer and 6.4 percentage points (95% CI, 4.9-7.9; 8.9% vs 2.5%; P = 1.9 x 10^-23) after. Gap rates were similar for intravenous-available (9.9%) and oral-only (11.4%) drugs (rate difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 4.5; P = .34). None of six prespecified predictors reached significance after correction. Significance: An antiseizure medication administration gap occurred in approximately 1 of every 10 drug-transition observations at the ICU-to-floor transfer, exceeding matched non-transfer gap rates by 5.8 to 6.4 percentage points. This transfer-associated excess, rather than any single medication or patient characteristic, supports a structured medication-continuity check.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: a multicenter retrospective chart review 94%
- Efficacy of Naloxone in reducing hypoxemia and duration of immobility following focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures 92%
- Rest-Activity Rhythm Phenotypes in Adults with Epilepsy and Intellectual Disability 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- An international study to investigate and optimise the safety of discontinuing valproate in young men and women with epilepsy: protocol 92%
- The use of carbogen for interruption of febrile seizures - the randomized controlled CARDIF trial 91%
- Relation of in-utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs to pregnancy duration and size at birth 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inductive reasoning with large language models: a simulated randomized controlled trial for epilepsy 89%
- Distinct psychopathology profiles in patients with epileptic seizures compared to non-epileptic psychogenic seizures 87%
- Semaphorin 4D induced inhibitory synaptogenesis restores benzodiazepine sensitivity in a mouse model of Status Epilepticus 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.