Spectral and melanopic dose calibration of consumer see-through extended-reality glasses for controlled retinal photostimulation
Gaidica, M.; Rosengart, M.
Show abstract
Light reaching the retina is a primary regulator of human circadian physiology, acting largely through melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells with peak short-wavelength sensitivity. Delivering known, repeatable retinal doses outside the laboratory is difficult because conventional light sources leave viewing geometry, gaze, and ambient conditions uncontrolled. Consumer extended-reality (XR) glasses fix a bright binocular display in constant geometry relative to the eye, but their suitability as calibrated photic stimulators has not been established. Here we validate a commercial micro-OLED XR display (VITURE Luma Ultra) for controlled retinal photostimulation. A purpose-built host application renders exact 8-bit RGB stimuli while independently controlling hardware brightness and logging all intensity-determining state; spectral radiance was measured at the retinal position of a 3D-printed phantom head with an open-source miniature spectroradiometer, anchored to absolute units by a luminance transfer calibration. The blue primary peaks at 461 nm (FWHM 43 nm), is spectrally invariant across a >10-fold intensity range, and at maximum output delivers an estimated 299 lx melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance, above consensus daytime recommendations, while remaining roughly two orders of magnitude below photobiological safety limits. The red primary is visually effective with minimal melanopic drive (melanopic DER 0.10), enabling spectrally shifted evening stimulation. Unlike the immersive virtual-reality headsets previously used for calibrated light delivery, the see-through form factor preserves the wearer's view of the surroundings--relevant for clinical monitoring in supervised settings such as the intensive care unit. These results show that consumer XR glasses can serve as a dose-calibrated platform for wearable photostimulation using an open-source measurement chain, and provide groundwork for application-layer dose-response studies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological issues in visible LED therapy dermatological research and reporting 93%
- Smartphone screening for neonatal jaundice via ambient-subtracted sclera chromaticity: neoSCB app pilot study 93%
- Facile assembly of an affordable miniature multicolor fluorescence microscope made of 3D-printed parts enables detection of single cells 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating human rod photoreceptor function using pixelwise intensity-based optoretinography 91%
- Quotidian Profile of Vergence Angle in Ambulatory Subjects Monitored with Wearable Eye Tracking Glasses 90%
- Structure-Function Correlation Using a Targeted Image Guided Microperimetry Approach for Retinal Atrophic Diseases: A Methods Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.