Back

Differential impact of ageing on reward driven changes in motor control

Alghamdi, A. A.; Galea, J. M.

2026-08-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.24.746500 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Reward can influence both the selection and execution of goal-directed actions. Healthy ageing is associated with changes in reward processing, raising the possibility that reward effects on motor control may be reduced in older adults. Objective: This study examined how monetary reward affects action execution and action selection during reaching movements and whether these effects differ between younger and older adults. Methods: 28 younger adults and 28 older adults performed a reward-based reaching task. Behaviourally non-distracted trials were used to assess action execution, whereas distractor-containing trials were used to assess action selection. Outcomes included maximum velocity, movement time, endpoint error, reaction time, and selection accuracy. Results: Reward increased maximum velocity and reduced movement time in both age groups without increasing error. These reward-related changes in movement vigour were larger in younger adults. During action selection, reward shortened reaction time but reduced selection accuracy in both groups, indicating faster but less accurate responses. The reward-related changes in reaction time and selection accuracy did not differ significantly between age groups. Conclusion: Ageing did not produce a uniform reduction in reward responsiveness. Instead, ageing attenuated reward-driven movement invigoration, while reward-related changes in action-selection behaviour were similar across age groups. These findings may inform the design of reward-based interventions that promote movement vigour without encouraging speed at the expense of accurate action selection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.