Back

Initial Staging 18F-FDG PET/CT for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Women with Breast Cancer

Fleming, M. R.; Tayon, K. G.; Schneider, A.; McPherson, A. D.; Bianco, S. M.; Parent, E. E.; Sharma, A.; Lin, G.; Norton, N.; Ray, J. C.

2026-08-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.08.24.26361275 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death among women with breast cancer, and the 2026 ACC/AHA dyslipidemia guideline endorses coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring to guide statin therapy before cardiotoxic treatment. Breast cancer patients routinely undergo staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, whose low-dose CT visualizes the coronary arteries, thus enabling CAC quantification at no additional cost or radiation. Methods. In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive women with newly diagnosed breast cancer undergoing staging 18F-FDG PET/CT (2009?2021) had semi-automated Agatston CAC scoring performed on the low-dose CT and were stratified by CAC presence (CAC-P) versus absence (CAC-A). We assessed a composite of cardiac diagnostic testing (stress testing, coronary CT angiography, invasive angiography), clinical events, and reclassification of statin eligibility per ACC/AHA guideline thresholds in a prevention-eligible subgroup. Results. Among 276 women (mean age 55.5 years; median follow-up 7.1 years), CAC was present in 68 (25%) but was clinically reported in only 5.4%. CAC-P was associated with more cardiac testing (34% vs 12%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 2.75, 95% CI 1.43?5.28) and, though underpowered, with more atherosclerotic events (7.4% vs 1.4%), but not with the all-cause composite. In the prevention-eligible subgroup (n=39), CAC scoring would have changed statin eligibility in 64%, initiating therapy in 62% of CAC-P women and supporting de-prescribing in 67% of CAC-A women. Conclusions. CAC can be feasibly quantified from staging PET/CT in women with breast cancer and would frequently reclassify statin eligibility at no additional cost or radiation, yet is rarely reported.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.