Relations between prenatal sleep health and maternal weight retention 2 to 7 years after a first birth: the NuMoM2b-HHS
Hawkins, M. S.; Clifton, R. B.; Levine, M. D.; Kim, N.; Personette, C. M.; Davenport, M. A.; Kozai, A. B.; Kolko-Conlon, R. P.; Phan, D.; Grobman, W.; Ryan, J. T.; Ranzini, A. C.; Page, J.; Haas, D. M.; Bairey Merz, C. N.; Saade, G.; Yee, L. M.; Zee, P. C.; Chung, J.; Catov, J. M.
Show abstract
Background: Poor prenatal sleep health is associated with greater gestational weight gain, but the contributions to longer-term maternal weight retention remain unclear. Purpose: To examine associations between prenatal sleep health across multiple domains and maternal weight retention 2 to 7 years after a first birth. Methods: Participants were from the nuMoM2b-Heart Health Study. Self-reported sleep was assessed during early (6 to 13 6/7 weeks) and mid-pregnancy (22 to 28 6/7 weeks) across six domains: regularity, quality, sleepiness, timing, efficiency, and duration. A multidimensional sleep health (MSH) score reflected the number of domains meeting healthy thresholds. Outcomes included maternal weight retention, total and substantial (>11 lbs.), from pre-pregnancy to 2 to 7 years after a first birth. Associations were estimated using adjusted linear regression for total weight retention and Poisson regression with robust variance for substantial weight retention. Results: The sample included 3,661 individuals with data in early (n = 2,962) and mid-pregnancy (n = 3,210). In early pregnancy, healthy sleep duration was associated with lower total weight retention, whereas healthy sleep regularity was unexpectedly associated with greater retention. In contrast, during mid-pregnancy, a higher MSH score was associated with a lower risk of substantial weight retention (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99). Healthy sleep duration and quality were the two individual domains associated with lower weight retention (2 to 3 lbs.). Conclusions: In a prospective cohort of pregnant nulliparous individuals, healthy prenatal sleep, particularly during mid-pregnancy, was associated with less maternal weight retention 2 to 7 years after delivery. Future studies should estimate the causal effects of sleep health on long-term maternal weight retention.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of the environment in overweight and eating behavior variability: Insights from a multivariate twin study. 91%
- Genetic contributions to BMI fluctuation and its associations with BMI and its trajectories over adolescence and early adulthood: a 25-year follow-up longitudinal study of Finnish twins. 90%
- Babytwins Study Sweden (BATSS): A multi-method infant twin study of genetic and environmental factors influencing infant brain and behavioral development 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are adversities and worries during the COVID-19 pandemic related to sleep quality? Longitudinal analyses of 48,000 UK adults 94%
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 91%
- Sleep does not influence schema-facilitated motor memory consolidation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and changes in diet, physical activity and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from eight longitudinal studies 91%
- Establishing the relationships between adiposity and reproductive factors: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis 90%
- Infant Subcortical Brain Volumes Associated with Maternal Obesity and Diabetes: A Large Multicohort Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Satisfaction with Life in relation to Sleep Health among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults 93%
- Synergistic effects of cardiovascular health and social isolation on adverse pregnancy outcomes 92%
- The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.