Automated Detection of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones on Intraoperative Cholangiography Using Deep Learning
He, Y.; Bloom, M.; Mirshojae, S.; Noel, L.; Qureshi, T.; Xie, Y.; Phillips, E.; Li, D.; Huang, X.
Show abstract
Objective: To evaluate the case-level performance of deep-learning segmentation models for detecting extrahepatic bile duct stones on representative intraoperative cholangiography images (IOC) and to characterize the completeness of individual-stone localization. Background: Retained bile duct stones can cause biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and pancreatitis. However false-positive interpretation of filling defects may prompt additional downstream procedures. Computer vision has been applied to biliary anatomy recognition and IOC adequacy assessment, but patient-level stone detection and individual-stone localization remain insufficiently studyed. Methods: Representative IOC images were annotated for extrahepatic biliary anatomy and stones, with case-level stone status established using a composite clinical reference standard. Two deep-learning models were developed to delineate the common bile duct and common hepatic duct and to detect and localize stones. Case-level diagnostic performance was evaluated against the composite clinical reference standard, and individual-stone localization was evaluated against expert-reviewed annotations. Results: On the held-out 125 patients test set, MiT-B2-UNet identified 23 of 25 stone-positive cases and 95 of 100 stone-negative cases, corresponding to a sensitivity of 0.920, specificity of 0.950, and AUC of 0.986. nnU-Net identified 19 of 25 stone-positive cases and 98 of 100 stone-negative cases, corresponding to a sensitivity of 0.760, specificity of 0.980, and AUC of 0.959. At the individual-stone level, MiT-B2-UNet and nnU-Net localized 31 of 59 and 25 of 59 annotated stones, respectively; all annotated stones were localized in 13 of 25 and 12 of 25 stone-positive cases. Conclusions: Deep-learning models can identify stone-positive IOC cases and localize individual stones. This technology may help inte
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 92%
- Unsupervised Neural Network-Based Image Stitching Method for Bladder Endoscopy 91%
- "GERPACYST- The Trial Protocol Of The Prospective, Multicenter, Interdisciplinary German Pancreas Club Cyst Registry" 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective evaluation of transpancreatic sphincterotomy comparing to needle-knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation: short-and long-term outcomes 93%
- Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data 93%
- VISTA: Virtual ImmunoSTAining for pancreatic disease quantification in murine cohorts 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 90%
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 87%
- Digital pathology assessment of kidney glomerular filtration barrier ultrastructure in an animal model of podocytopathy 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Annotation-free multi-organ anomaly detection in abdominal CT using free-text radiology reports: A multi-center retrospective study 91%
- Spatial and temporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review 86%
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Comprehensive Assessment of the Aortic Valve Stenosis Continuum in Echocardiography 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 92%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 88%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.