Regulation-Driven Variation in Utilization and Cost of B-Cell Depleting Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-National Study
Angell, T.; Streicher, N. S.
Show abstract
Background: Rituximab and ocrelizumab target the same CD20 receptor. Rituximab is off-patent and prescribed off-label; ocrelizumab is licensed and patent-protected. Whether the resulting differences in utilization and cost reflect clinical value or regulatory structure has not been examined. Objective: To determine whether utilization and cost of B-cell depleting therapy across six health systems track regulatory approval status more closely than comparative effectiveness. Methods: We examined rituximab and ocrelizumab utilization and cost in Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and the United States (2016-2024). Costs were drawn from published national sources on a consistent ex-factory basis. Utilization was registry-measured for Sweden, France and Germany, measured from national claims for the United States, and estimated from indirect data for the United Kingdom and Italy. Weighted annual costs per patient on B-cell depleting therapy were modeled by Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations). Results: Rituximab constituted the near-totality of B-cell depleting therapy in Sweden but 2.3% to 18.7% of use in the other five systems. Mean annual cost per patient ranged from $3,014 (Sweden) to $52,506 (United States), a 17-fold difference, with the four other European systems between $18,140 and $26,262. Adopting Sweden's utilization pattern was associated with modeled five-year per-patient differences in drug acquisition cost of $76,000 to $248,000. Conclusion: Utilization and cost align more closely with regulatory approval status than with available effectiveness data. International reference pricing acts on the price of the licensed agent but leaves intact the regulatory asymmetry that determines which agent is prescribed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Masitinib Limits Neuronal Damage, as Measured by Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration, in a Model of Neuroimmune-Driven Neurodegenerative Disease 89%
- Imbalanced Machine Learning Classification Models For Removal Biosimilar Drugs And Increased Activity In Patients With Rheumatic Diseases 88%
- A low molecular weight dextran sulphate, ILB(R), for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): an open-label, single-arm, single-centre, phase II trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators in relapsing MS estimated with a treatment sequence model 93%
- Rituximab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland 92%
- The ocrelizumab phase II extension trial suggests the potential to improve the risk:benefit balance in multiple sclerosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework 88%
- mRNA-based COVID-19 booster vaccination is highly effective and cost-effective in Australia 87%
- Modelling the impact of long-acting monoclonal antibody, maternal vaccine and hybrid programs of RSV immunisation in temperate Western Australia 87%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pausing methotrexate improves immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases 88%
- Humoral response to Pfizer mRNA vaccine against SARS CoV2, in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and the impact on the rheumatic disease activity 87%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 breakthrough infections among vaccinated patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.