Polygenic Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Disease Predict Risk Factor Control and Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Stroke Survivors
Bragazzi, N. L.; Zhang, L.; Omarov, M.; Zivkovic, L.; Georgakis, M. K.
Show abstract
Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with high residual vascular risk among survivors despite optimal secondary prevention. The contribution of inherited polygenic risk to this residual vulnerability remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed 2,701 stroke survivors (mean age 59.8{+/-}7.1 years, 61.7% male) from the UK Biobank. Stroke- and coronary artery disease (CAD)-polygenic risk scores (metaGRS), comprising approximately 3.2 million and 1.7 million genetic variants, respectively, were derived from large-scale genome-wide association studies using penalized regression. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), while secondary outcomes included recurrent stroke and vascular risk factor control. metaGRS associations with incident MACE and recurrent stroke were tested using Cox models, whereas associations with baseline risk-factor control were assessed using logistic regression. Mediation analyses quantified indirect effects of metaGRS to MACE via HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure. Results: Over 12 years, 731 MACE events (27.1%) and 351 recurrent stroke events (13.0%) occurred. CAD-metaGRS was independently associated with future MACE (age- and sex-adjusted HR per SD increment 1.15, 95%CI 1.07-1.24; p<0.001), whereas higher stroke- and CAD metaGRS were both associated with poorer glycemic control. A higher CAD-metaGRS was also associated with poorer lipid control. Mediation analyses identified glycemic regulation as a significant pathway linking polygenic risk to recurrent vascular events. Conclusions: Polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular disease are associated with recurrent vascular events and vascular risk factor control among stroke survivors, pointing to potentially actionable insights in secondary prevention that merit further investigation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 95%
- Genetic downregulation of interleukin-6 signaling and arteriolosclerotic cerebral small vessel disease: a drug target Mendelian randomization analysis 95%
- Estimating the Population Benefits of Blood Pressure Lowering: A Wide-Angled Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a risk prediction algorithm for high-risk populations combining genetic and conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease 92%
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction and estimating benefits from novel interventions 92%
- AORTA Gene: Polygenic prediction improves detection of thoracic aortic aneurysm 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Subtype Specificity of Genetic Loci Associated with Stroke in 16,664 cases and 32,792 controls 95%
- Interleukin-6 signaling effects on ischemic stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes: a Mendelian Randomization study 95%
- Validation of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease in French Canadians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic Susceptibility to Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control in Stroke Survivors 95%
- Interplay between Chronic Kidney disease, Hypertension, and Stroke: Insights from a Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis 94%
- Diabetes mellitus, glycemic traits, and cerebrovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.