Back

When adiposity and listening to reasons for behavioral change make food choices healthier: Behavioral and neural mediators of weight status effects on dietary decision-making following behavioral change interventions.

Flament, B.; Rodrigues, B.; Khalid, I.; Rotge, J. Y.; Poitou-Bernert, C.; Plassmann, H.; Schmidt, L.

2026-08-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.14.744895 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Resolving the inner conflict between improving eating habits (change talk) and sticking to unhealthy ones (sustain talk) is a key target in communication-based behavioral change interventions such as motivational interviewing (MI). Recent work has shown that this inner conflict affects how tastiness and healthiness are traded off in dietary decision-making. The effect varied with body mass index (BMI). Here we aimed to identify why participants with higher BMI shifted toward healthier food choices after listening to change talk. An evidence accumulation model found that BMI affected health evidence sampling when listening to change talk, and taste evidence sampling when listening to sustain talk. A serial mediation analysis showed that the effect of BMI on change-talk-induced health evidence sampling was explained by stronger resting-state connectivity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex within the default mode network (DMN), which in turn predicted greater motivation to change eating habits. These cross-sectional findings indicate that the intrinsic functional organization of valuation-related regions within the DMN is associated with motivation to change. They provide evidence that these neural and behavioral factors need to align with contextual cues, such as weight status (as reflected by BMI), and with reasons for behavioral change to promote healthier decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.