Daily Bowel Movements are Associated with Stronger Gut-Brain Phase-Amplitude Coupling and Better Cognitive Performance
Ertürk, Z.; Nielsen, K.; Jakobsen, L. M. A.; Gottlieb, A. D.; Bertram, H. C.; Roager, H. M.; Karabanov, A. N.
Show abstract
Gut-brain communication has emerged as a rapidly expanding field of research, with recent electrophysiological studies revealing rhythmic gut-brain coupling between gastric activity and brain oscillations in humans. Gut motility is a key determinant of gastrointestinal function, but it remains unclear whether individual differences in gut motility reflected by weekly bowel movements (e.g., defecation frequency) are associated with differences in gut-brain coupling. Here, we address this question by examining women with self-reported daily bowel movements (N = 38) and women with less frequent bowel movements (N = 38). We recorded simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and electrogastrography (EGG) at fasting state, performed cognitive assessments, and analysed faecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) as markers of colonic fermentation. In a subset of participants, EEG-EGG coupling was assessed twice over an interval of at least eight weeks to assess test-retest reliability. In this group, EEG-EGG coupling showed moderate test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.50). When comparing the two groups of women, the phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) analysis between EEG and EGG signals revealed a significantly stronger gut-brain coupling in women with daily bowel movements compared to women with less frequent bowel movements (p = 0.03). We additionally found that women with daily bowel movements made less errors in the cognitive tasks and had higher levels of faecal SCFAs. A path analysis suggested that bowel movements significantly affect gut-brain phase-amplitude coupling through faecal SCFAs. However, neither faecal SCFAs nor phase-amplitude coupling significantly predicted cognitive performance, suggesting the existence of alternative pathways for the association between bowel movements and cognitive performance. Together, our findings suggest that the strength of gut-brain coupling is associated with bowel movements and cognitive performance, making EEG-EGG coupling a promising marker of human gut-brain interactions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiota-Short Chain Fatty Acid Relationships and Microbial Substrate Preferences Vary Across the Spectrum of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) 93%
- Modulation of intestinal bile acids influences colonic mucosal responses 91%
- Assessment of Gut Microbial β-Glucuronidase and β-Glucosidase Activity in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the microbial contribution to human Energy Balance using the Digestion, Absorption, and Microbial Metabolism (DAMM) model 92%
- Effects of a spore-forming probiotic blend on bowel habits and physical well-being in adults with functional constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 92%
- Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autonomic responses to proprioceptive and visual errors during single-trial reach adaptation 88%
- Menstrual cycle phase alters corticospinal excitability and spike-timing-dependent plasticity in healthy females 86%
- Interindividual variations in peak alpha frequency do not predict the magnitude or extent of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency stimulation 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic state modulates neural processing of odors in the human olfactory bulb 90%
- The impact of contingency awareness on the neurocircuitry underlying pain-related fear and safety learning 87%
- EEG-based clusters differentiate psychological distress, sleep quality and cognitive function in adolescents 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.