Cannabis use and Cancer: Dissecting genetic causality for site-specific risks through two-sample Mendelian Randomization
Lukhere, E.; Kachingwe, B.; Kipandula, W.; Chiphangwi, N.; Singini, M. G.; Kamiza, A. B.
Show abstract
Background: The prevalence of cannabis use is increasing at an alarming rate owing to its legalization and decriminalization in some countries. Epidemiological evidence on the association between cannabis use and cancer is inconsistent and conflicting. Herein, we performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate whether cannabis use is causally associated with site-specific cancers in individuals of European ancestry. Methods: We identified 22 independent genetic variants strongly associated with cannabis use (p-value < 5 x 10-8) in a large meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of individuals of European ancestry. Genome-wide association summary-level data on site-specific cancers were obtained from individuals of European ancestry in FinnGen, Finland. MR analyses were performed using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and multivariable method. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the simple median, weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier methods. Results: Our multivariable IVW analyses adjusted for cigarette smoking found that genetic liability to cannabis use was causally associated with esophageal cancer (odds ratio [OR] =1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.29-2.15, p-value =0.013) and lung cancer (OR=1.35, 95% CI = 1.13-1.58, p-value =0.009). However, genetic liability to cannabis use exerted a protective effect against pancreatic cancer (OR=0.77, 95% CI =0.57-0.91, pvalue=0.032) in individuals of European ancestry in the FinnGen. Our sensitivity analyses found no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy between cannabis use and site-specific cancers. Conclusion: We found that genetic liability to cannabis use was associated with esophageal, lung, and pancreatic cancers in individuals of European ancestry.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic analysis of lung cancer reveals novel susceptibility loci and germline impact on somatic mutation burden 90%
- Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers 89%
- Time-dependent relationship between urinary biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation and colorectal cancer risk 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 90%
- Lifestyle and Environmental Risk Factors Associated with Cancer: A Case-Control Study in Bangladesh 89%
- Sex and Gender Influences on Problematic Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorder: A Scoping Review Protocol 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabis use and the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma: a Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Increased adiposity is protective for breast and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study using up to 132,413 breast cancer cases and 85,907 prostate cancer cases. 91%
- Evidence of a Causal Association Between Cancer and Alzheimer’s Disease: a Mendelian Randomization Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a mouse model of contemporary cannabis smoke exposure 89%
- Expression of the endocannabinoid system in the human airway epithelial cells: Impact of sex and chronic respiratory disease status 87%
- Development and validation of an open-source, disposable, 3D-printed in vitro environmental exposure system for Transwell culture inserts 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking methylation marks for prediction of urothelial cancer risk 90%
- Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction. 90%
- The Multiethnic Cohort: A Resource for the study of Genetic and non-Genetic Cancer Risk Across Populations 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.