Back

DrosoTracker: a web application with a self-calibrating thermal model for husbandry scheduling and lifespan analysis in Drosophila melanogaster

Asti Tello, G. S.; Melani, M.; Liberman, A. C.

2026-08-11 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.08.10.743933 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Planning husbandry tasks and experiments with Drosophila melanogaster requires converting a target date into development times that depend on the rearing temperature. This calculation needs to be done for each cross, genotype, and temperature, and the risk of error grows quickly. Available laboratory management tools let users register stocks, crosses, and track them, but they do not create schedules based on a clear, adjustable thermal model. To fill that gap, we developed DrosoTracker, a self-contained web application that works offline and predicts Drosophila development with a thermal summation model recalibrated through regression on data from Powsner (1935) (T0 = 11.78 {degrees}C, DD = 116.38 {degrees}C{middle dot}days, R{superscript 2} = 0.997). The model offers an optional two-level calibration driven by user observations. A wild-type strain first adjusts the model to the laboratorys own conditions. Then each genotype is calibrated against that reference using a random-effects shrinkage estimator that accounts for measurement error and between-batch variability. The model creates schedules for husbandry tasks, evaluates adult cohort survival with the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test, and calculates sample size for lifespan studies using Schoenfelds formula. The quantitative components were checked against independent references, including Rs survival package and manual calculations. Ongoing work is focused on validating the calibrated model using cohorts specifically bred for this purpose. DrosoTracker runs entirely in the browser, stores data locally, and is available in English and Spanish.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.