Investigating the potential causal relationship between parity and long-term maternal cardiometabolic health outcomes using Mendelian randomization
Brito Nunes, C.; Fraser, A.; Moen, G.-H.; Hatton, A. A.; Evans, D.
Show abstract
Background: Multiple observational studies have reported associations between greater parity and increased CVD risk. Whether these associations reflect causal effects or are confounded by socioeconomic factors remains unclear. Methods: We investigated associations between number of children ever born (NEB) and 16 cardiometabolic traits in up to 172,122 females and 138,390 males in the UK Biobank, and an independent sample of 53,237 UK Biobank spousal pairs. We additionally conducted sex-stratified two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and applied a novel spousal MR framework, in which an individual's spouse's genotype was used as the instrumental variable to estimate the causal effect of NEB on cardiometabolic health outcomes, as an approach to minimize bias from horizontal pleiotropy. Results: NEB was associated with multiple cardiometabolic traits in the multivariable regression, even after adjustment for socioeconomic status, with differences in the strength of association observed between males and females. Traditional MR provided evidence that higher NEB causally increases type 2 diabetes risk in females, body mass index (BMI) in both sexes, female basal metabolic rate (BMR) and male body fat percentage but decreases female blood pressure. Spousal MR corroborated positive effects on female BMI and BMR and additionally suggested inverse causal effects on female HDL cholesterol and ApoA1 and male blood glucose. Conclusion: These findings indicate a possible causal relationship between NEB and long-term cardiometabolic health, although causal effects are likely to be small.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Educational attainment as a modifier of the effect of polygenic scores for cardiovascular risk factors: cross-sectional and prospective analysis of UK Biobank 94%
- Genetic Risk Scores for Cardiometabolic Traits in Sub-Saharan African Populations 93%
- Evaluating the direct effects of childhood adiposity on adult systemic metabolism: A multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racism and health and wellbeing among children and youth - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- COVID-19, economic downturn, and long-term trajectories of population mental health: evidence from two nationally representative British birth cohorts at the intersection of gender and socioeconomic position 88%
- Association of COVID-19 employment disruption with mental and social wellbeing: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between body fat distribution and metabolic syndrome traits and outcomes: a Mendelian Randomization study 93%
- The effect of liver enzymes on body composition: a Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Alcohol use and cardiometabolic risk in the UK Biobank: a Mendelian randomization study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 pandemic and temporal change in metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a natural experiment within the HELIUS study 93%
- Racial Differences in Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Physical, Mental, and Behavioral Health 89%
- Low uptake of COVID-19 prevention behaviours and high socioeconomic impact of lockdown measures in South Asia: evidence from a large-scale multi-country surveillance programme 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-specific associations of adiposity with cardiometabolic traits: multi-life-stage cohort study with repeat metabolomics 94%
- The Association Between Cognitive Ability and Body Mass Index: A Sibling-Comparison Analysis in Four Longitudinal Studies 93%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.